Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Aug 3, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 29, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 10, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 14, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

From Testers to Cocreators—the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study

Jacob C, Bourke S, Heuss S

From Testers to Cocreators—the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(4):e41481

DOI: 10.2196/41481

PMID: 36102548

PMCID: 9585443

From testers to co-creators: the value and approaches to successful patient engagement in the development of eHealth solutions – Qualitative Expert Interviews Study

  • Christine Jacob; 
  • Steven Bourke; 
  • Sabina Heuss

ABSTRACT

Background:

Research has shown that patient engagement is most commonly done in the beginning of research or to test readily available prototypes and less commonly in other phases such as the execution phases. Previous studies report that patients usually are assigned a consultative, rather than decision-making role in health service planning and evaluation.

Objective:

This study had two objectives; to better understand the challenges and opportunities in the inclusion of patients in the development of eHealth technologies and ideas on how to overcome the identified gaps, as well as creating a research-based end-to-end practical blueprint that can guide the relevant stakeholders to successfully engage patients as co-creators in all human-centred design phases rather than mere testers of preplanned prototypes.

Methods:

Key informant interviews were conducted, through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 participants in 6 countries across Europe. This was followed by a focus group to validate the initial findings. Participants encompassed all the relevant stakeholder groups including patient experts, eHealth experts, health technology providers, clinicians, Pharma executives, and health insurance experts.

Results:

This study shows that engaging patients in eHealth development can help provide different types of value; namely identifying unmet needs, better usability and desirability, better fit into the patient journey, better adoption and stickiness, better health outcomes, advocacy and trust, a sense of purpose, and better health equity and access. However, the participants agreed that patients are usually engaged too late in the development process, mostly assuming a sounding role in testing a ready-made prototype. The justification for these gaps in engagement are driven by some prominent barriers, notably compliance risks, patient-related factors, power dynamics, patient engagement as lip service, poor value perception, lack of resources, mistrust, and inflexibility. On the positive side, the participants also reflected on facilitators for better patient engagement; for instance, engaging through engagement partners, novel approaches such as the rise of professional patient experts, embedding patients in the development teams, expectation management, and professional moderation services.

Conclusions:

Overcoming the current gaps in patient engagement in eHealth development requires consolidated efforts from all stakeholders in the complex healthcare ecosystem. The shift towards more patient-driven eHealth development requires education and awareness, frameworks to monitor and evaluate the value of patient engagement, regulatory clarity and simplification, platforms to facilitate patient access and identification, patient incentivization, transparency and trust, and a mindset shift towards value-based healthcare. Clinical Trial: Not Applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jacob C, Bourke S, Heuss S

From Testers to Cocreators—the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(4):e41481

DOI: 10.2196/41481

PMID: 36102548

PMCID: 9585443

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.