Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 7, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women’s Health

Goodday S, Karlin D, Suver C, Friend S

The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women’s Health

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(10):e41417

DOI: 10.2196/41417

PMID: 36264611

PMCID: 9634512

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The post Roe political landscape demands a morality of caution for women’s health research

  • Sarah Goodday; 
  • Daniel Karlin; 
  • Christine Suver; 
  • Stephen Friend

ABSTRACT

The recent Dobbs decision and current political landscape surrounding abortion rights in the United States has the potential to dramatically disrupt progress in women’s health research. The typical safeguards to ensure confidentiality and privacy of research participants may not hold against criminal investigations surrounding suspected pregnancy terminations. This puts women participating in health research that collects sensitive reproductive information at an increased risk of having this information being used against them by some states or other individuals. There are additional risks to women participating in women’s digital health research studies involving the use of wearable devices capable of tracking physiological measures such as body temperature and heart rate as these have shown promise for tracking conception and could be used to identify pregnancy termination signatures. There are strategies researchers can take to protect the safety of female participants in reproductive health research, while also maintaining integrity of research methods. Here, we discuss potential strategies, and invite others to join this discussion so as not let the current political landscape impede progress in women’s health research, while also protecting research participants.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Goodday S, Karlin D, Suver C, Friend S

The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women’s Health

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(10):e41417

DOI: 10.2196/41417

PMID: 36264611

PMCID: 9634512

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.