Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Jul 26, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 31, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review

Alhasani R, George N, Radman D, Auger C, Ahmed S

Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023;10:e41359

DOI: 10.2196/41359

PMID: 37581911

PMCID: 10466154

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision Making: A Scoping Review

  • Rehab Alhasani; 
  • Nicole George; 
  • Dennis Radman; 
  • Claudine Auger; 
  • Sara Ahmed

ABSTRACT

Background:

The field of rehabilitation has seen a recent rise in technologies to support shared decision-making (SDM), though it is unclear how usability testing is integrated into the design process.

Objective:

This scoping review aimed to answer the following research questions: (1) Which methods and measures have been used to produce knowledge about the usability of rehabilitation technologies aimed at supporting SDM at the different phases of development and implementation? (2) Which parameters of usability have been measured and reported?

Methods:

This review was followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework. An electronic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from 2005 up to November 2020. Two independent reviewers screened all retrieved titles, abstracts and full texts according to the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. The characteristics of studies were outlined in a descriptive summary. Findings were categorized based the usability parameters, technology interventions and measures of usability.

Results:

A total of 38 articles were included. Technologies for SDM included clinical decision support systems (26%), mobile health apps (26%), web-based aids (47%), and electronic patient-reported outcome systems (11%). The usability of SDM technologies was assessed during development, pre-implementation, or implementation through 14 different methods, most frequently through usability questionnaires (28%), largely mapped to the parameter of satisfaction (83%).

Conclusions:

The reported methods, measures and usability parameters demonstrated limitations in the evaluation of usability of SDM technologies for rehabilitation. A comprehensive approach to usability evaluation should be used to reflect the complicated concept of usability, involving inspection and empirical methods that span multiple usability parameters (effectiveness, efficiency, memorability, productivity, security and satisfaction). As the process of SDM aims to improve patient-centered care, the involvement of patients and clinicians in the development process through comprehensive usability testing may assist in developing health technologies that reflect their needs and priorities.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alhasani R, George N, Radman D, Auger C, Ahmed S

Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023;10:e41359

DOI: 10.2196/41359

PMID: 37581911

PMCID: 10466154

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.