Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 20, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 22, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study

Albali NH, Almudarra SS, Al-Farsi YM, Alarifi AM, Penttinen P

Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41269

DOI: 10.2196/41269

PMID: 37018033

PMCID: 10131602

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance System in Six Gulf Cooperation Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Nawaf H Albali; 
  • Sami S. Almudarra; 
  • Yahya M. Al-Farsi; 
  • Abdullah M. Alarifi; 
  • Pasi Penttinen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Evaluating the public health surveillance systems is important for ensuring that events of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Evaluation studies based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines have been used to appraise surveillance systems globally. Previous evaluation studies undertaken in the member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were limited to specific illnesses within a single nation.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess public health monitoring systems in GCC countries using CDC guidelines.

Methods:

The CDC guidelines were used for evaluating the surveillance systems in GCC countries. Representatives from the countries were asked to rate 43 indicators across the systems’ level of usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, data quality, stability, and timeliness. Descriptive data analysis and univariate linear regression analysis were deployed.

Results:

All surveillance systems in the GCC covered communicable diseases, and about two-thirds of them covered healthcare associated infections (66.7; 95%CI 29.9, 90.3). The global mean score was 147.0. The UAE scored the highest in the global score rating 167 (83.5; 95%CI 77.7, 88.0), and Oman obtained the highest score for usefulness, simplicity, and flexibility. Strong correlations were observed between the global score and the level of usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness, and timeliness, and negative correlation between stability and timeliness score. Disease coverage was the most significant predictor of the GCC surveillance global score.

Conclusions:

The GCC member nations’ surveillance systems are beneficial and perform optimally. Other countries must utilize the lessons learned from the success of the systems of UAE and Oman. It is necessary to reform technical assistance, centralized information exchange, and system architecture to maintain the GCC surveillance systems’ viability and adaptability for preventing future potential health risks.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Albali NH, Almudarra SS, Al-Farsi YM, Alarifi AM, Penttinen P

Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41269

DOI: 10.2196/41269

PMID: 37018033

PMCID: 10131602

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.