Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 11, 2022 - Sep 5, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 4, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 5, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Digital First Healthcare Approach to Managing Pandemics: A Scoping Review of Pandemic Self-Triage Tools
ABSTRACT
Background:
During COVID-19, many tools were designed to allow people to input their own information and the digital tool providing direction to care which could include self-care.
Objective:
The purpose of this scoping review was to look at the state of the literature on self-triage tools that direct or advise care for adults during a pandemic.
Methods:
A scoping review was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane. Articles were selected if they reported on digital self-triage tools that directed to care specifically regarding pandemic virus and included adults.
Results:
A total of 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most of the articles were published in 2020 or 2021 and addressed the COVID-19 pandemic. However, one study was published in 2011 and related to the H1N1 pandemic. The studies reported on tools in 17 different countries. Related to the direction of care, advice might include to go to an ER, seek urgent care, contact, or see a doctor, or stay at home and self-isolate. Two of the studies evaluated the usability of the tool, and one evaluated the quality of triage advice.
Conclusions:
The key findings from the studies suggest that the tools, while having similarities in directing to care (ER, physician, self-care), differ in a variety of ways. Some tools provide data to predict healthcare demand and others are intended to be used repeatedly by the end user. Future studies should evaluate the quality of these screening tools to ensure quality and effectiveness. Clinical Trial: n/a
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.