Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 25, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Assessment of Medical Device Software Supporting Health Care Services for Chronic Patients in a Tertiary Hospital: Overarching Study

Baltaxe E, Hsieh M, Roca J, Cano I

The Assessment of Medical Device Software Supporting Health Care Services for Chronic Patients in a Tertiary Hospital: Overarching Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e40976

DOI: 10.2196/40976

PMID: 36598817

PMCID: 9873251

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessment of medical device software supporting healthcare services for chronic patients: experience from a tertiary hospital

  • Erik Baltaxe; 
  • Moriah Hsieh; 
  • Josep Roca; 
  • Isaac Cano

ABSTRACT

Background:

Innovative digital health tools are increasingly being evaluated and, in some instances, integrated at scale into health systems. However, applicability of assessment methodologies in real-life scenarios to demonstrate value generation and, consequently, foster sustainable adoption of digitally enabled health services still shows bottlenecks.

Objective:

To build on lessons learnt in the process of pre-market assessment of four digital health interventions piloted at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (HCB), as well as in the analysis of current Medical Device Software (MDSW) regulations and post-market surveillance in EU and USA, to generate recommendations towards large scale adoption.

Methods:

Four digital health interventions using prototypes were piloted at HCB. Co-creation and quality improvement methodologies were used to consolidate a pragmatic evaluation method to assess end-user’s (both patients and healthcare professionals) perceived usability and satisfaction by means of the System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score, including general questions about satisfaction. Analyses of both Medical Software Device (MDSW) regulations and post-market surveillance in EU and USA (2017-2021) were done. Finally, an overarching analysis on lessons learnt was conducted considering four domains (technical, clinical, usability and cost), as well as differentiating among three different eHealth strategies (Telehealth, Integrated Care and Digital Therapeutics).

Results:

Among the participant stakeholders, the system usability scale was consistently higher in case of patients (78, 67, 56 and 76) than in health professionals (52, 43, and 54), and, in general terms, patients would recommend more the use of the supporting digital health tools (NPS of -3, 31, -21 and 31) than professionals (NPS of -67, 1 and -80). The overarching analysis resulted in pragmatic recommendations for the digital health evaluation domains and the eHealth strategies considered.

Conclusions:

Lessons learnt on digitalisation of health resulted in practical recommendations that could contribute to fostering future deployment experiences.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Baltaxe E, Hsieh M, Roca J, Cano I

The Assessment of Medical Device Software Supporting Health Care Services for Chronic Patients in a Tertiary Hospital: Overarching Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e40976

DOI: 10.2196/40976

PMID: 36598817

PMCID: 9873251

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.