Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 20, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study

Ross J, Cotterill S, Bower P, Murray E

Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e40961

DOI: 10.2196/40961

PMID: 36853751

PMCID: 10015356

Influences on patient uptake and engagement with the NHS Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: a qualitative interview study.

  • Jamie Ross; 
  • Sarah Cotterill; 
  • Peter Bower; 
  • Elizabeth Murray

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital diabetes prevention programmes (digital-DPP) are being implemented as population based approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention in several countries in order to address problems with uptake of traditional face-to-face diabetes prevention programmes (f2f-DPP). However, assessments of digital-DPPs have largely focused on clinical outcomes and usability among those who have taken them up, while crucial information on decision-making about uptake (e.g. whether a user downloads and registers on the application) and engagement (e.g. the extent of usage of the application or its components over time) is limited. A greater understanding of factors that influence uptake and engagement decisions may support large-scale deployments of digital-DPPs in real world settings.

Objective:

This study aims to explore key influences on uptake and engagement decisions of those offered the National Health Service ‘Healthier You’: Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-digital-DPP).

Methods:

A qualitative interview study using semi structured interviews. Participants were adults, aged 18 or over, diagnosed with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia, who had been offered the NHS-digital-DPP. Recruitment was via four providers of the NHS-digital-DPP and three primary care practices in England. Interviews were conducted remotely and were guided by a theoretically informed topic guide.

Results:

Interviews were conducted with thirty two participants who had either accepted or declined the NHS-digital-DPP. Seven overarching themes were identified as important factors in both decisions to take-up and engage with the NHS-digital-DPP. These were: (1) Knowledge and understanding (2) Referral process (3) Self-efficacy (4) Self-identity (5) Motivation and support (6) Advantages of digital and (7) Reflexive monitoring. Perceptions of accessibility and convenience of the NHS-digital-DPP were particularly important for uptake and barriers in terms of the referral process and healthcare professional engagement were reported. Specific digital features including health coaches and monitoring tools were important for engagement.

Conclusions:

This study adds to the literature on factors that influence uptake and engagement of digital-DPPs and suggests that digital-DPPs can overcome many of the barriers to uptake of f2f-DPPs in supporting lifestyle changes aimed at diabetes prevention.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ross J, Cotterill S, Bower P, Murray E

Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e40961

DOI: 10.2196/40961

PMID: 36853751

PMCID: 10015356

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.