Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 26, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 13, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Challenges in Recruiting University Students for Web-based Indicated Prevention of Depression and Anxiety: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial (ICare Prevent)
ABSTRACT
Background:
Depression and anxiety are common mental health conditions in college/ university student populations. Offering transdiagnostic, web-based prevention programs, such as ICare Prevent, to those with subclinical complaints has the potential to reduce some barriers to receiving help, e.g., availability of services, privacy considerations, and students’ desire for autonomy. Accounts of recruitment challenges are needed to complement available effectiveness research in student populations.
Objective:
The aims of the current study are to describe recruitment challenges together with effective recruitment strategies for ICare Prevent, and to provide basic information on the intervention’s effectiveness.
Methods:
A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a student sample with subclinical symptoms of depression and anxiety on the effectiveness of a guided and unguided version of ICare Prevent, a web-based intervention with transdiagnostic components for the indicated prevention of depression and anxiety compared to care-as-usual (CAU). Descriptive statistics are used to outline recruitment challenges and effective online and offline strategies, as well as students’ use of the intervention. A basic analysis of intervention effects was conducted using a Bayesian linear mixed model.
Results:
Direct recruitment through students’ email addresses via the central student administration was the most effective channel. Data of 35 participants were analyzed (guided= 14, unguided= 8, CAU= 13). Use of the intervention was low, with an average of three out of seven sessions completed. Analyses did not suggest any intervention effects other than anecdotal evidence (all BF10≤ 2.7).
Conclusions:
This report adds to the existing literature on recruitment challenges specific to the student population. Testing the feasibility of recruitment measures and greater involvement of the target population in their design, as well as shifting from direct towards indirect prevention can potentially help future studies in the field. In addition, it demonstrates an alternative basic analytical strategy for underpowered RCTs. Clinical Trial: The trial has been registered at the Dutch trial register (Nederlands Trial Register, NTR6562).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.