Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 19, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 4, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 8, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feasibility and Acceptability of Web-Based Structured Oral Examinations for Postgraduate Certification: Mixed Methods Preliminary Evaluation

Burch V, McGuire JK, Buch E, Sathekge M, Mbouaffou F, Sekubuge F, Fagan J

Feasibility and Acceptability of Web-Based Structured Oral Examinations for Postgraduate Certification: Mixed Methods Preliminary Evaluation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e40868

DOI: 10.2196/40868

PMID: 38064633

PMCID: 10919348

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Postgraduate specialist and subspecialist certification examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa: Online structured oral examinations

  • Vanessa Burch; 
  • Jessica Kate McGuire; 
  • Eric Buch; 
  • Mike Sathekge; 
  • Francis Mbouaffou; 
  • Flavia Sekubuge; 
  • Johannes Fagan

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic prevented many medical specialist programmes across the world from conducting certification examinations. However, the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa (CMSA), which is responsible for conducting all specialist and sub-specialist certification examinations in South Africa, continued conducting examinations despite the pandemic.

Objective:

The study was conducted to determine the success and challenges of conducting SOEs using Zoom, with a special focus on acceptability of this examination format to candidates.

Methods:

The CMSA hosted 2933 candidates undertaking examinations for 95 diploma, specialist and sub-specialist qualifications. Of these, 2176 candidates participated in examinations requiring SOEs which amounted to 7226 individual Zoom calls. A survey was conducted during the first cycle of examinations in 2020 to assess the acceptability of the examination format to candidates.

Results:

Pass rates ranged from 82% to 96% for the respective qualifications across two examination cycles. The overall pass rate for these 2 examination cycles was higher than that of the previous 6 examination cycles for the CMSA. The majority of 542 candidates who completed the survey felt that it was a fair examination method that tested their clinical reasoning and insight appropriately. They also felt that the case scenarios were of adequate complexity, and that the material was well presented.

Conclusions:

This ambitious undertaking has demonstrated that virtual, case-based SOEs are a feasible and acceptable examination option. It is anticipated that the positive outcome of this study, the significant time and cost savings to candidates, examiners and the organization will motivate member colleges to support the ongoing use of virtual SOEs as part of the composite examination package.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Burch V, McGuire JK, Buch E, Sathekge M, Mbouaffou F, Sekubuge F, Fagan J

Feasibility and Acceptability of Web-Based Structured Oral Examinations for Postgraduate Certification: Mixed Methods Preliminary Evaluation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e40868

DOI: 10.2196/40868

PMID: 38064633

PMCID: 10919348

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.