Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Jul 5, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 4, 2022 - Jul 12, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 13, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of Practicing With and Obtaining Crowdsourced Feedback From the Video-Based Communication Assessment App on Resident Physicians’ Adverse Event Communication Skills: Pre-post Trial

White AA, King AM, D’Addario AE, Brigham KB, Dintzis S, Fay EE, Gallagher TH, Mazor KM

Effects of Practicing With and Obtaining Crowdsourced Feedback From the Video-Based Communication Assessment App on Resident Physicians’ Adverse Event Communication Skills: Pre-post Trial

JMIR Med Educ 2022;8(4):e40758

DOI: 10.2196/40758

PMID: 36190751

PMCID: 9577713

The Effects of Practice and Crowdsourced Feedback using Video-based Communication Assessment on Resident Physician Adverse Event Communication Skills: Pre-post Trial

  • Andrew A White; 
  • Ann M King; 
  • Angelo E D’Addario; 
  • Karen Berg Brigham; 
  • Suzanne Dintzis; 
  • Emily E Fay; 
  • Thomas H Gallagher; 
  • Kathleen M Mazor

ABSTRACT

Background:

Residents require practice and feedback to meet ACGME mandates and patient expectations for effective communication after harmful errors. Current instructional approaches have limitations. The Video-based Communication Assessment (VCA) is a novel tool to simulate scenarios for practice and obtaining crowdsourced assessments and feedback on physician communication skills.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of VCA practice and feedback for the development of resident error disclosure skills.

Methods:

Pre-post study in 2020 with residents in pathology, OB/GYN, and internal medicine at an academic medical center. Resident audio responses to VCA scenarios were rated by at least 8 crowdsourced laypeople. Ratings were aggregated to create overall assessment scores on a 5-point scale for each resident for baseline (time one) and post-feedback (time two). Residents completed a survey of demographic characteristics.

Results:

Forty-eight residents completed two cases at time one, received a feedback report at four weeks, and completed two more cases. Mean ratings of residents’ communication were higher at time two compared to time one (3.75 vs 3.53, P<.001). Residents who reported prior error disclosure experience performed better at time one compared to those without such experience (3.63 vs. 3.46, p < .05). No differences in communication ratings were detected by specialty or years in training. Residents’ communication was rated higher for angry cases than sad cases (3.69 vs. 3.58, p < .05).

Conclusions:

Residents at all training levels can potentially improve error disclosure skills with VCA practice and feedback. Error disclosure curricula should prepare residents to respond to a range of patient affects.


 Citation

Please cite as:

White AA, King AM, D’Addario AE, Brigham KB, Dintzis S, Fay EE, Gallagher TH, Mazor KM

Effects of Practicing With and Obtaining Crowdsourced Feedback From the Video-Based Communication Assessment App on Resident Physicians’ Adverse Event Communication Skills: Pre-post Trial

JMIR Med Educ 2022;8(4):e40758

DOI: 10.2196/40758

PMID: 36190751

PMCID: 9577713

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.