Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jul 1, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 1, 2022 - Jul 15, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences in Telerehabilitation: Qualitative Content Analysis

Qvarfordt M, Nilsson E, Nilsson L

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences in Telerehabilitation: Qualitative Content Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e40690

DOI: 10.2196/40690

PMID: 37074772

PMCID: 10157457

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Healthcare professionals’ experiences in telehabilitation: a qualitative study

  • Maria Qvarfordt; 
  • Evalill Nilsson; 
  • Lina Nilsson

ABSTRACT

Background:

In Swedish healthcare, the use of telerehabilitation has increased in an effort to make healthcare more accessible. At organizational levels, trust in digitalization has stabilized, but a certain degree of skepticism appears to exist among healthcare employees.

Objective:

In the present study, we explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of tele(re)habilitation through qualitative interviews carried out with employees at a habilitation center who have worked with patients and colleagues through digital mediums.

Methods:

Qualitative interviews were conducted followed by qualitative content analysis.

Results:

The analysis revealed that there are mixed feelings regarding the digital format used at the habilitation center; namely concerns that the digital format is not suitable for every individual, or every case. Even though some skepticism remained regarding the digital format, there seemed to be a parallel understanding of the motives and benefits of digitalization. Positive aspects of the format were identified, e.g., increased healthcare accessibility and workday flexibility, but emphasis was placed on considering the appropriateness of digital encounters for each individual patient.

Conclusions:

Managing a workday influenced by the balance between digital and physical demands forces HCP to adjust to the digital format as part of an increasingly digitally-managed workday. Being aware of digitalization as a workplace development process, and constantly having to adapt to the changing demands (considering that digital formats are not for every time) is complex yet required. Driven by professional values such as, for example, putting patient care first, negotiating the pros and cons of healthcare digitalization is a constantly-evolving and challenging process.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Qvarfordt M, Nilsson E, Nilsson L

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences in Telerehabilitation: Qualitative Content Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e40690

DOI: 10.2196/40690

PMID: 37074772

PMCID: 10157457

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.