Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Dermatology (no longer under consideration since Nov 23, 2022)

Date Submitted: Jun 29, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 29, 2022 - Aug 24, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Sentiment Analysis on Tweets Related to Alopecia Areata, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, and Psoriasis: Revealing the Patient Experience of Disease

  • Tai Lin Lee; 
  • Steven T Chen; 
  • Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma; 
  • Christine Ko

ABSTRACT

Background:

Psychiatric comorbidities can commonly occur in patients suffering from chronic dermatologic disorders. Sentiment analysis of disease-related tweets helps identify patients’ experiences of skin disease.

Objective:

To analyze the expressed sentiments in tweets related to alopecia areata (AA), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and psoriasis (PsO) in comparison to fibromyalgia (FM).

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional analysis of Twitter users’ expressed sentiment on AA, HS, PsO, and FM. Tweets related to the diseases of interest were identified with keywords and hashtags for one month (April 2022) using the Twitter standard application programming interface (API). Text, account types, and numbers of retweets and likes were collected. The sentiment analysis was performed by the R ‘tidytext’ package using the AFINN lexicon.

Results:

A total of 1,505 tweets were randomly extracted, of which 243 (16.15%) referred to AA, 186 (12.36%) to HS, 510 (33.89%) to PsO, and 566 (37.61%) to FM. The mean sentiment score was -0.239 ± 2.90. AA, HS, and PsO had similar sentiment scores (p = 0.482) and the average was significantly more positive than FM (p < 0.0001). Tweets from private accounts were more negative, especially for AA (p = 0.0082). Words reflecting patients’ psychological states were found differently in different diseases. ‘Anxiety’ was associated with AA and FM posts but not with HS and PsO; while ‘crying’ was frequently used in HS posts. There was no definite correlation between the sentiment score and the number of retweets or likes, although negative AA tweets from public accounts received more retweets (p = 0.03511) and likes (p = 0.0228).

Conclusions:

The use of Twitter sentiment analysis is a promising method to document patients’ experience of skin disease. This technique has the potential to improve patient care, strategize public health policies, and direct organizational campaigns. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lee TL, Chen ST, Ma KSK, Ko C

Sentiment Analysis on Tweets Related to Alopecia Areata, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, and Psoriasis: Revealing the Patient Experience of Disease

JMIR Preprints. 29/06/2022:40643

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.40643

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40643

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.