Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jun 21, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Domains, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Cost, and Acceptability of Telehealth in Aging Care: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

Zhang Y, Leuk JSP, Teo WP

Domains, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Cost, and Acceptability of Telehealth in Aging Care: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

JMIR Aging 2023;6:e40460

DOI: 10.2196/40460

PMID: 37071459

PMCID: 10155091

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Domains, feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and acceptability of telehealth in ageing care: a scoping review of systematic reviews

  • Yichi Zhang; 
  • Jessie Siew-Pin Leuk; 
  • Wei-Peng Teo

ABSTRACT

Background:

Global ageing is becoming a major global challenge. Older adults often have greater health needs compared to the younger generation but are facing inadequate access to appropriate, affordable, and high-quality health care. Telehealth can remove the geographic and time boundaries, as well as enabling the socially isolated and physically homebound people to access a wider range of care options. A variety of telehealth interventions have been designed and applied in different settings to older people with different health conditions, but the results regarding their feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and acceptability were not consistent.

Objective:

This review aims to consolidate the evidence of telehealth's feasibility, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability in the context of ageing care, identify gaps in the literature, and determine the priorities for future research.

Methods:

Guided by the methodological framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), we reviewed systematic reviews concerning all types of telehealth interventions involving direct communication between older users and healthcare providers. Five major electronic databases, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO (EBSCO) were searched on 16th September 2021, and an updated search was performed on 28th April 2022 across the same databases as well as the first ten pages of the Google search.

Results:

29 systematic reviews including one post-hoc sub-analysis of a previously published large Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis were included. We summarized the domains, as well as evidence of the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and acceptability of telehealth. Having better-designed telehealth interventions, improved telehealth policies and regulations, as well as more high-quality and rigorous future research is crucial to strengthening the research evidence and addressing the increasingly multi-faceted health needs of older adults.

Conclusions:

Though telehealth remains in its infancy and there is a lack of high-quality studies to rigorously prove the feasibility, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of telehealth, mounting evidence has indicated that it is playing an important complementary role in the care of the ageing population.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhang Y, Leuk JSP, Teo WP

Domains, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Cost, and Acceptability of Telehealth in Aging Care: Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

JMIR Aging 2023;6:e40460

DOI: 10.2196/40460

PMID: 37071459

PMCID: 10155091

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.