Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Jun 21, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 20, 2022 - Jul 4, 2022
Date Accepted: May 12, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 12, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Addressing Behavioral Barriers to COVID-19 Testing With Health Literacy–Sensitive eHealth Interventions: Results From 2 National Surveys and 2 Randomized Experiments

Bonner C, Batcup C, Cvejic E, Ayre J, Pickles K, Copp T, Cornell S, Nickel B, Dhahir M, McCaffery K

Addressing Behavioral Barriers to COVID-19 Testing With Health Literacy–Sensitive eHealth Interventions: Results From 2 National Surveys and 2 Randomized Experiments

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e40441

DOI: 10.2196/40441

PMID: 37172319

PMCID: 10337324

Behavioural barriers to COVID-19 testing: developing and testing health literacy interventions

  • Carissa Bonner; 
  • Carys Batcup; 
  • Erin Cvejic; 
  • Julie Ayre; 
  • Kristen Pickles; 
  • Tessa Copp; 
  • Samuel Cornell; 
  • Brooke Nickel; 
  • Mustafa Dhahir; 
  • Kirsten McCaffery

ABSTRACT

Background PCR testing for COVID-19 was crucial in Australia’s prevention strategy in the first 2 years of the pandemic, including required testing for symptoms, contact, travel and certain professions. However, flu tracking data indicated that half of Australians were not getting tested for symptoms, and little was known about the drivers and barriers of COVID-19 testing as a novel behaviour. Objective We conducted 4 studies to identify and address COVID-19 testing barriers, with a focus on meeting the needs of people with lower health literacy. Methods and Results Study 1 was a national survey in June 2020 (n=1369), where testing barriers were elicited and coded using the COM-B framework (capability-opportunity-motivation-behavior). Barriers were identified in all three categories. Study 2 was a national survey in November 2020 (n=2869) to estimate prevalence of testing barriers and health literacy disparities, which found knowledge gaps for people with lower vs higher health literacy. Study 3 was a randomised experiment testing health literacy-sensitive written information for a wide range of capability/motivation barriers in February-March 2021, but no differences were found compared to government information (n=1314). Study 4 was a randomised experiment testing 2 audio-visual interventions addressing a smaller number of common barriers in November 2021, targeting young adults with lower health literacy. A fact-based animation and Tiktok intervention presenting the same facts in a humorous style both increased knowledge but not testing intentions, compared to government information (n=1527). Conclusions This study identified a wide range of capability, opportunity and motivation barriers to a novel testing behaviour. These barriers were prevalent even in a health system where COVID-19 testing was free and widely available, and additional access barriers have been reported in other contexts. We showed that key capability barriers such as knowledge gaps can be improved with simple audio-visual communication targeting people with lower health literacy. Additional behaviour change strategies are required to address motivational issues to support testing uptake. The findings may inform planning for future COVID-19 variant outbreaks and new public health emergencies where novel testing behaviours are required.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bonner C, Batcup C, Cvejic E, Ayre J, Pickles K, Copp T, Cornell S, Nickel B, Dhahir M, McCaffery K

Addressing Behavioral Barriers to COVID-19 Testing With Health Literacy–Sensitive eHealth Interventions: Results From 2 National Surveys and 2 Randomized Experiments

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e40441

DOI: 10.2196/40441

PMID: 37172319

PMCID: 10337324

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.