Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 14, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 31, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 2, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Associated With the Utilization of Outpatient Virtual Clinics: Retrospective Observational Study Using Multilevel Analysis

Tzeng YH, Yin WH, Lin KC, Wei J, Liou HR, Sung HJ, Lang HC

Factors Associated With the Utilization of Outpatient Virtual Clinics: Retrospective Observational Study Using Multilevel Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e40288

DOI: 10.2196/40288

PMID: 35917486

PMCID: 9377537

Factors Associated With the Utilization of Outpatient Virtual Clinics: Retrospective Observational Study Using Multilevel Analysis

  • Yun-Hsuan Tzeng; 
  • Wei-Hsian Yin; 
  • Kuan-Chia Lin; 
  • Jeng Wei; 
  • Hao-Ren Liou; 
  • Hung-Ju Sung; 
  • Hui-Chu Lang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine and virtual consultations globally, complex factors that may affect the use of virtual clinics are still unclear.

Objective:

This study aimed to identify factors associated with the utilization of virtual clinics in the experience of virtual clinic service implementation in Taiwan.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 187,742 outpatient visits (187,742 in-person visits and 10,972 virtual visits) completed at a large general hospital in Taipei City from May 19 to July 31, 2021 after rapid implementation of virtual outpatient clinic visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data of patients’ demographic characteristics, disease chronicity, physicians’ features and subspecialties were collected; and physicians’ opinions regarding virtual clinics were surveyed and evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. Multilevel analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with the utilization of virtual clinics.

Results:

Patient/visit-level, physician-level, and department-level factors accounted for 67.6%, 11.1%, and 21.4% of the total variance in utilization of virtual clinic, respectively. Female gender (odds ratio [OR]=1.27, P<.001), residing at a greater distance away from the hospital (OR=2.36 if distance ≥50 km, P<.001; OR=3.95 if extensive travel required, P<.001), reimbursement by the National Health Insurance (OR=7.29, P<.001), seeking care for a chronic disease (OR=1.33, P<.001), physician’s positive attitude about virtual clinics (OR=1.50, P=.002), and visits within certain departments including the heart center, psychiatry, and internal medicine (OR=2.55, P =.004) were positively associated with the utilization of virtual clinics.

Conclusions:

Our study demonstrates that factors at different levels contributed to the utilization of virtual clinics. The findings may help direct policymaking for expanding the use of virtual clinics, especially in countries struggling with the development and promotion of telemedicine virtual clinic services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tzeng YH, Yin WH, Lin KC, Wei J, Liou HR, Sung HJ, Lang HC

Factors Associated With the Utilization of Outpatient Virtual Clinics: Retrospective Observational Study Using Multilevel Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e40288

DOI: 10.2196/40288

PMID: 35917486

PMCID: 9377537

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.