Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Jun 13, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 13, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis

Robinson SA, Zocchi M, Purington C, Am L, DeLaughter K, Vimalananda VG, Netherton D, Ash AS, Hogan TP, Shimada SL

Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis

JMIR Diabetes 2023;8:e40272

DOI: 10.2196/40272

PMID: 36951903

PMCID: 10131591

Secure messaging for diabetes management: Content Analysis

  • Stephanie Alayne Robinson; 
  • Mark Zocchi; 
  • Carolyn Purington; 
  • Linda Am; 
  • Kathryn DeLaughter; 
  • Varsha G. Vimalananda; 
  • Dane Netherton; 
  • Arlene S. Ash; 
  • Timothy P. Hogan; 
  • Stephanie L. Shimada

ABSTRACT

Background:

Secure messaging use is associated with improved diabetes-related outcomes. However, it is less clear how secure messaging supports diabetes management.

Objective:

We examined secure message topics between patients and clinical team members in a national sample of Veterans with type 2 diabetes to understand use of secure messaging for diabetes management and potential associations with glycemic control.

Methods:

We surveyed and analyzed the content of secure messages between 448 US Veterans Health Administration patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinical teams. We also explored the relationship between secure messaging content and glycemic control.

Results:

Explicit diabetes-related content was the most frequent topic (72.1% of participants), followed by blood pressure (31.7% of participants). Among diabetes-related conversations, 90.7% of patients discussed medication renewals or refills. More participants with good glycemic control engaged in ≥ 1 thread about blood pressure compared to those with poor control (37.5% vs 27.2%, P=.022). More patients with good glycemic control engaged in ≥ 1 thread intended to share information with their clinical team about an aspect of their diabetes management compared to those with poor control (23.7% vs. 12.4%, P=.009).

Conclusions:

There were few differences in secure messaging topic between patients in good versus poor glycemic control. Those in good control were more likely to engage in informational messages to their team and send messages related to blood pressure. It may be that the specific topic content of the secure messages may not be that important for diabetic control. Simply making it easier for patients to communicate with their clinical teams may be the driving influence between associations previously reported in the literature between secure messaging and positive clinical outcomes in diabetes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Robinson SA, Zocchi M, Purington C, Am L, DeLaughter K, Vimalananda VG, Netherton D, Ash AS, Hogan TP, Shimada SL

Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis

JMIR Diabetes 2023;8:e40272

DOI: 10.2196/40272

PMID: 36951903

PMCID: 10131591

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.