Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Jun 5, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 22, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Reporting, Monitoring, and Handling of Adverse Drug Reactions in Australia: Scoping Review

Fossouo Tagne J, Yakob RA, Dang TH, Mcdonald R, Wickramasinghe N

Reporting, Monitoring, and Handling of Adverse Drug Reactions in Australia: Scoping Review

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e40080

DOI: 10.2196/40080

PMID: 36645706

PMCID: 9887513

Reporting, Monitoring and Handling of Adverse Drug Reactions in Australia: A Scoping Review

  • Joel Fossouo Tagne; 
  • Reginald Amin Yakob; 
  • Thu Ha Dang; 
  • Rachael Mcdonald; 
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe

ABSTRACT

Background:

Medications aim to relieve suffering & ailment, but they can be associated with adverse side effects or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). ADRs are a major cause of hospital admissions and cause a significant strain on healthcare funding in Australia and Globally. There is little integrative and collective knowledge on ADR reporting and monitoring in the Australian healthcare system.

Objective:

This review aims to investigate the current trends in ADR reporting, monitoring, and handling in the Australian healthcare system and describe related interventions.

Methods:

A comprehensive search of appropriate keywords, regarding ADRs was used to search 6 electronic databases to retrieve peer-reviewed scientific articles published from 2010 to 2021. Only articles with a precise focus on ADRs in the Australian medicine’s management context were included.

Results:

Seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The findings offer a comprehensive picture of ADR reporting and monitoring in the Australian healthcare system. The current ADR systems were compiled with the involvement of both consumer/ patients and healthcare providers to record or report all types of ADRs of various severities and aimed at improving ADR monitoring and reporting. The major barrier to consumer/patients’ participation is awareness to reporting mechanisms. Consumers are also more likely to report ADRs to their doctor or pharmacists. Documentation of opioid and penicillin ADR reports in hospital electronic health records shows nurses and pharmacists to be significantly less likely than doctors to omit the reaction description and pharmacists significantly more likely to enter the correct classification than doctors.

Conclusions:

There is a need to (1) improve the current initiatives on public awareness to ADR reporting and the provision of report feedback to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration; (2) implement digital solutions to support consumer/patients reporting and empower healthcare providers to electronically capture and report ADRs within their clinical workflow; (3) undertake studies to understand ADR management at the primary healthcare institutional level; (4) develop and validate frameworks to evaluate novel technological solutions designed to facilitate pharmacovigilance and improve the safety of medicines management in Australia.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fossouo Tagne J, Yakob RA, Dang TH, Mcdonald R, Wickramasinghe N

Reporting, Monitoring, and Handling of Adverse Drug Reactions in Australia: Scoping Review

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e40080

DOI: 10.2196/40080

PMID: 36645706

PMCID: 9887513

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.