Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: May 18, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: May 18, 2022 - Jun 1, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Feb 27, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Eliciting Opinions on Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Survey Study

Ruiz S, Okere UC, Eggers M, Schwarz M, O'Leary C, Politi M, Wan F, Housten AJ

Eliciting Opinions on Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Survey Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e39697

DOI: 10.2196/39697

PMID: 36848256

PMCID: 10176135

Eliciting Opinions on Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Survey Study

  • Sienna Ruiz; 
  • Uzoma Charles Okere; 
  • Michelle Eggers; 
  • Melanie Schwarz; 
  • Catina O'Leary; 
  • Mary Politi; 
  • Fei Wan; 
  • Ashley J. Housten

ABSTRACT

Background:

Effective public health messaging has been necessary throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, but stakeholders have struggled to communicate critical information to the public, especially in different types of locations like urban and rural areas.

Objective:

To identify opportunities to improve COVID-19 messages for community distribution in rural and urban settings and summarize findings to inform future messaging.

Methods:

We purposively sampled by region (urban or rural) and participant type (general public or healthcare professional) to survey participants about their opinions on four COVID-19 health messages. We designed the survey and analyzed data following pragmatic health equity implementation approaches. Following qualitative analysis of surveys, we designed new COVID-19 messages incorporating participant feedback and redistributed the messages via short survey.

Results:

Sixty-seven participants enrolled: 31 from the rural Southeast Missouri “Bootheel,” 27 from urban St. Louis, and 9 St. Louis healthcare professionals. Overall, we found no qualitative differences between the responses of our urban and rural samples to the open-ended questions. Participants across groups wanted familiar COVID-19 protocols, personal choice in COVID-19 preventive behaviors, and clear source information. Healthcare professionals contextualized their suggestions within the specific needs of their patients. All groups suggested practices consistent with health literate communications. We reached 83.1% of participants for message redistribution, and most had overwhelmingly positive responses to the new messages.

Conclusions:

We suggest new methods for community involvement in the creation of health messaging through the use of short online survey. We identify areas of improvement for future health messaging like re-affirming the preventive practices advertised early in a crisis, framing messages to allow for personal choice of preventive behavior, highlighting well-known source information, using plain language, and crafting messages for readers that are applicable to their circumstances.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ruiz S, Okere UC, Eggers M, Schwarz M, O'Leary C, Politi M, Wan F, Housten AJ

Eliciting Opinions on Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Survey Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e39697

DOI: 10.2196/39697

PMID: 36848256

PMCID: 10176135

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.