Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 18, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Digital Interventions for Psychological Well-Being in University Students.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Life at university provides important opportunities for personal growth, however, this developmental phase also coincides with the peak period of risk for onset of mental health disorders. In addition, specific university lifestyle factors, including impaired sleep and academic and financial stress, are known to exacerbate psychological distress in students. As a result, university students have been identified as a vulnerable population who often experience significant barriers to accessing psychological treatment. Digital psychological interventions are emerging as a promising solution for this population, but their effectiveness remains unclear.
Objective:
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed digital interventions targeting Psychological Well-Being (PWB) for university students.
Methods:
Database searches were conducted 02.12.2021 via EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science.
Results:
Thirteen eligible studies were identified; 10 included in a meta-analysis. Mean pre-post effect sizes indicated such interventions led to small and significant PWB improvement (g=0.32, 95% CIs 0.23 to 0.40, P<.001). These effects remained, albeit smaller, when studies which included a waitlist control group were excluded (g=0.22, 95% CIs 0.08 to 0.35, P=0.002). An analysis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy approaches revealed small and significant effects (k=6, g=0.35, 95% CIs 0.25 to 0.45, P<.001).
Conclusions:
Online interventions hold considerable promise for university students, although features that optimise service delivery and outcome require further assessment. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO Trial Registration: CRD42020196654
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.