Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: May 17, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 18, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

User Experiences in a Digital Intervention to Support Total Skin Self-examination by Melanoma Survivors: Nested Qualitative Evaluation Embedded in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Reilly F, Wani N, Hall S, Morgan HM, Allan J, Constable L, Ntessalen M, Murchie P

User Experiences in a Digital Intervention to Support Total Skin Self-examination by Melanoma Survivors: Nested Qualitative Evaluation Embedded in a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e39544

DOI: 10.2196/39544

PMID: 37632942

PMCID: 10335150

User Experiences of a Digital Intervention to Support Total-Skin-Self-Examination by Melanoma Survivors; a nested qualitative evaluation embedded in a randomised trial

  • Felicity Reilly; 
  • Nuha Wani; 
  • Susan Hall; 
  • Heather May Morgan; 
  • Julia Allan; 
  • Lynda Constable; 
  • Maria Ntessalen; 
  • Peter Murchie

ABSTRACT

Background:

Melanoma is a common cancer with a high survival rate, as well as a high chance of recurrence. Combined, this leads to a high burden of follow-up. Total-Skin-Self-Examination (TSSE) improves clinical outcomes of melanoma via early detection of new primaries and recurrences, and technology is an increasingly popular means of facilitating TSSE. Thus, the Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) digital healthcare intervention was developed.

Objective:

Nested within a randomised control trial, this study used qualitative interviews to explore participants’ experiences of TSSE, their orientation toward technology and both participant and professionals’ practical and technical experiences of the ASICA intervention.

Methods:

Semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken during the randomised controlled trial with the participants and the coordinating Dermatology Nurse Practitioner (DNP). Participants were purposively sampled to achieve a representative sample. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a Framework Analysis approach applied within NVivo12.

Results:

Twenty-two interviews were completed with participants and one with the coordinating DNP. ASICA appeared to change participants’ perceptions of skin-checking: users were more likely to report routinely performing TSSE thoroughly. There was some variation in beliefs about skin-checking and using technology for healthcare generally. Overall, ASICA was experienced positively by participants and the DNP. Several clear practical suggestions were made for how ASICA can be improved.

Conclusions:

The ASICA app appears to have positively influenced the attitudes and TSSE practices of melanoma survivors. Technical improvements are required, but the app offers promise for technologically enhanced melanoma follow-up in future. Clinical Trial: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03328247. Registered on 1 November 2017 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03328247?term=ASICA&rank=1


 Citation

Please cite as:

Reilly F, Wani N, Hall S, Morgan HM, Allan J, Constable L, Ntessalen M, Murchie P

User Experiences in a Digital Intervention to Support Total Skin Self-examination by Melanoma Survivors: Nested Qualitative Evaluation Embedded in a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e39544

DOI: 10.2196/39544

PMID: 37632942

PMCID: 10335150

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.