Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 9, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 27, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Feb 27, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Application of Phylodynamic Tools to Inform the Public Health Response to COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Expert Opinions

Rich S, Richards V, Mavian C, Rife Magalis B, Grubaugh N, Rasmussen S, Dellicour S, Vrancken B, Carrington C, Fisk-Hoffman R, Danso-Odei D, Chacreton D, Shapiro J, Seraphin MN, Hepp C, Black A, Dennis A, Trovao N, Vandamme AM, Rasmussen A, Lauzardo M, Dean N, Salemi M, Prosperi M

Application of Phylodynamic Tools to Inform the Public Health Response to COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Expert Opinions

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e39409

DOI: 10.2196/39409

PMID: 36848460

PMCID: 10131930

Application of phylodynamic tools to inform the public health response to COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of expert opinions.

  • Shannan Rich; 
  • Veronica Richards; 
  • Carla Mavian; 
  • Brittany Rife Magalis; 
  • Nathan Grubaugh; 
  • Sonja Rasmussen; 
  • Simon Dellicour; 
  • Bram Vrancken; 
  • Christine Carrington; 
  • Rebecca Fisk-Hoffman; 
  • Demi Danso-Odei; 
  • Daniel Chacreton; 
  • Jerne Shapiro; 
  • Marie Nancy Seraphin; 
  • Crystal Hepp; 
  • Allison Black; 
  • Ann Dennis; 
  • Nidia Trovao; 
  • Anne-Mieke Vandamme; 
  • Angela Rasmussen; 
  • Michael Lauzardo; 
  • Natalie Dean; 
  • Marco Salemi; 
  • Mattia Prosperi

ABSTRACT

Background:

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists have scrambled to collect and analyze SARS-CoV-2 genomic data to inform public health responses to COVID-19 in real-time. Open-source phylogenetic and data visualization platforms for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 genomic epidemiology have rapidly gained popularity for their ability to illuminate spatial-temporal transmission patterns worldwide. However, the utility of such tools to inform public health decision-making for COVID-19 in real-time remains to be explored.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to convene experts in public health, infectious diseases, virology, and bioinformatics – many of whom were actively engaged in the COVID-19 response at the time of their participation – to discuss the application of phylodynamic tools to inform pandemic responses.

Methods:

A series of four virtual focus group discussions were hosted between June 2020 and June 2021, covering the pre- and post-variant and vaccination eras of the COVID-19 crisis. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim, and an iterative, thematic qualitative framework was used for analysis.

Results:

Of the 41 individuals invited, 23 total participants (56.1%) agreed to participate. Across the four focus group sessions, 15 (65%) of the participants were female, 17 (74%) were white, and 5 (22%) were black. Participants were described as molecular epidemiologists (ME, n=9), clinician-researchers (n=3), infectious disease experts (ID, n=4), and public health professionals (PH) at the local (n=4), state (n=2), and federal (n=1) levels. Collectively, participants felt that successful uptake of phylodynamic tools relies on the strength of academic-public health partnerships. They called for interoperability standards in sequence data sharing and cited many resource issues that must be addressed, including timeliness and cost, in addition to improving issues related to sampling bias and the translation of phylodynamic findings into public health action.

Conclusions:

This was the first qualitative study to characterize the perspectives of key experts regarding the utility of phylodynamic tools for the public health response to COVID-19. The focus group participants identified key areas for improvement of existing and future phylogenetic and data visualization platforms for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 genomic epidemiology. This information is critical to both policymakers and developers as they consider how to handle existing and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants during the ongoing crisis.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rich S, Richards V, Mavian C, Rife Magalis B, Grubaugh N, Rasmussen S, Dellicour S, Vrancken B, Carrington C, Fisk-Hoffman R, Danso-Odei D, Chacreton D, Shapiro J, Seraphin MN, Hepp C, Black A, Dennis A, Trovao N, Vandamme AM, Rasmussen A, Lauzardo M, Dean N, Salemi M, Prosperi M

Application of Phylodynamic Tools to Inform the Public Health Response to COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Expert Opinions

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e39409

DOI: 10.2196/39409

PMID: 36848460

PMCID: 10131930

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.