Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 4, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: May 4, 2022 - Jun 29, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 22, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 23, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey

Korshakova E, Marsh J, Kleinberg S

Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(9):e39274

DOI: 10.2196/39274

PMID: 35998198

PMCID: 9557754

Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey

  • Elena Korshakova; 
  • Jessecae Marsh; 
  • Samantha Kleinberg

ABSTRACT

Background:

People’s health-related knowledge influences health outcomes, as this knowledge may influence whether individuals follow advice from their doctors or public health agencies. Yet little attention has been paid to where people obtain health information and how these sources influence the quality of knowledge.

Objective:

We aim to discover what sources people use to learn about health conditions and how these sources influence the quality of their health knowledge.

Methods:

We surveyed 200 different individuals at 12 timepoints from March 2020 through September 2020. At each timepoint, we elicited participants’ knowledge about causes, risk factors, and preventative interventions for eight viral (Ebola, common cold, COVID-19, Zika) and non-viral illnesses (food allergies, ALS, strep throat, stroke). Participants were further asked how they learned about each illness and to rate how much they trust various sources of health information.

Results:

We found that participants used different sources to obtain health information on common illnesses (food allergies, strep throat, stroke) compared to emerging illnesses (Ebola, common cold, COVID-19, Zika). Participants relied mainly on news media, government agencies, and social media for information about emerging illnesses, while learning about common illnesses from family, friends, and medical professionals. The number of sources participants used was positively correlated with health knowledge quality, though there was no relationship with the specific source types consulted.

Conclusions:

Building on prior work on health information seeking and factors affecting health knowledge, we now find that people systematically consult different types of sources by illness type, and that the number of sources people used affected the quality of individuals’ health knowledge. Participants relied on social media for information about COVID-19, with their knowledge accuracy of COVID-19 declining over the course of the pandemic. Interventions to disseminate health information may need to be targeted to where individuals are likely to seek out information, and these sources differ systematically by illness type.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Korshakova E, Marsh J, Kleinberg S

Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(9):e39274

DOI: 10.2196/39274

PMID: 35998198

PMCID: 9557754

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.