Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 18, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Influencing How Providers Assess the Appropriateness of Video Visits: Interview Study With Primary and Specialty Health Care Providers

Gray C, Wray C, Tisdale R, Chaudary C, Slightam C, Zulman D

Factors Influencing How Providers Assess the Appropriateness of Video Visits: Interview Study With Primary and Specialty Health Care Providers

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e38826

DOI: 10.2196/38826

PMID: 36001364

PMCID: 9453588

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Factors That Influence How Providers Assess the Appropriateness of Virtual Visits: A Qualitative Investigation

  • Caroline Gray; 
  • Charlie Wray; 
  • Rebecca Tisdale; 
  • Camila Chaudary; 
  • Cindie Slightam; 
  • Donna Zulman

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rapid implementation of virtual care (i.e., telephone or video-based clinic appointments) during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in many providers offering virtual care with little or no formal training and without clinical guidelines and tools to assist with decision-making. As new guidelines and tools take shape, it is critical that they are informed by an in-depth understanding of how providers make decisions about virtual care in their clinical practices.

Objective:

We sought to identify the most salient factors that influence how providers make decisions about when to offer patients video or telephone appointments instead of or in conjunction with in-person care.

Methods:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 28 healthcare providers located at the Veterans Health Administration (VA). We used an inductive, thematic approach to identify factors that impact provider decision-making.

Results:

Thematic analysis revealed distinct clinical, patient, and provider factors that influence provider decisions to initiate or continue with virtual visits. Clinical factors include patient acuity, the need for additional tests or labs, changes in patients’ health status, and if the patient is new or has no recent visit. Patient factors include patients’ ability to articulate symptoms or needs, availability and accessibility of technology, preferences for or against virtual visits, and access to caregiver assistance. Provider factors include provider comfort with and acceptance of virtual technology, and virtual physical exam skills and training.

Conclusions:

Providers within the VA system consider a complex set of factors when deciding whether to offer or continue a video or telephone visit. These factors can inform the creation of decision tools, guides, and other policies to ensure that virtual care expands access to high-quality care. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gray C, Wray C, Tisdale R, Chaudary C, Slightam C, Zulman D

Factors Influencing How Providers Assess the Appropriateness of Video Visits: Interview Study With Primary and Specialty Health Care Providers

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e38826

DOI: 10.2196/38826

PMID: 36001364

PMCID: 9453588

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.