Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 16, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 20, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use Intention and User Expectations of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Interventions: Internet-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

Cohen Rodrigues TR, Reijnders T, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Atsma DE, Evers AW

Use Intention and User Expectations of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Interventions: Internet-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e38803

DOI: 10.2196/38803

PMID: 38358784

PMCID: 10905349

Experimental study about the use intention of human-supported and self-help eHealth interventions: What is the role of user expectations?

  • Talia R Cohen Rodrigues; 
  • Thomas Reijnders; 
  • Veronica R Janssen; 
  • Roderik A Kraaijenhagen; 
  • Douwe E Atsma; 
  • Andrea WM Evers

ABSTRACT

Background:

Self-help eHealth interventions do not require support from a human and could therefore lower the workload of healthcare professionals. However, there are concerns about the uptake of self-help interventions. User expectations about the lack of a relationship (working alliance) with a healthcare professional could hinder uptake. Furthermore, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) identifies which expectations predict use intention. However, no studies have yet investigated how these expectations influence the uptake of self-help and human-supported eHealth interventions.

Objective:

This study investigated the intention to use a self-help eHealth intervention compared to a human-supported eHealth intervention, and the expectations that moderate this relationship.

Methods:

146 participants were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (human-supported or self-help). They evaluated screenshots of an human-supported or self-help app-based stress intervention. We measured intention to use the intervention, the UTAUT constructs performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence, and expected working alliance.

Results:

Use intention did not differ significantly between the two conditions (P = .26). Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and expected working alliance were positively related to use intention (P < .001, P = 0.049, P < .001, P < .001 respectively) regardless of condition. The interaction analysis showed that performance expectancy (P = .04), and effort expectancy (P = .045) more strongly influenced use intention in the self-help compared to the human-supported condition.

Conclusions:

As we found no difference in use intention, our results suggest that we could expect an equal uptake of self-help eHealth interventions and human-supported ones. We should however pay attention to people who have doubts about the intervention’s helpfulness or easiness of use. For those people, additional human support would be beneficial to ensure uptake. Screening user expectations could help healthcare professionals optimize self-help eHealth intervention uptake in practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cohen Rodrigues TR, Reijnders T, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Atsma DE, Evers AW

Use Intention and User Expectations of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Interventions: Internet-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e38803

DOI: 10.2196/38803

PMID: 38358784

PMCID: 10905349

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.