Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Sep 12, 2022)

Date Submitted: Apr 15, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 15, 2022 - Jun 10, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Digital News Navigator: A design fiction raising ethical considerations about systems that help older adults to recover from exposure to misinformation

  • Brian McInnis; 
  • Elizabeth Eikey; 
  • Raeanne C Moore; 
  • Shengzhi Wang; 
  • Camille Nebeker

ABSTRACT

Background:

Emotions are central to recognizing, responding, and recovering from an exposure to misinformation in social media. However, older adults are highly susceptible to misinformation in social media, due to the emotions involved with several key factors related to aging.

Objective:

Research is needed to speculate about the unknown unknown ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) associated with technologies that help older adults to recognize, respond, and recover from an exposure to misinformation in social media. Designing for older adult use of social media is challenging, because they exhibit different patterns of use and have limited access to digital literacy training. Additionally, there is a risk that some system designs might further disenfranchise already vulnerable populations.

Methods:

The paper presents research on a design fiction-based approach to speculate about the ELSIs related to a fictitious application called the “Digital News Navigator” (DN2) service. The DN2 was applied as a probe to reflect on potential unintended consequences of system design, reviewing a broad range of academic literature. To guide future research, the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers (DHC-R) was applied to contribute specific considerations related to ELSIs.

Results:

Together, the Author Statement and Discussion sections draw attention to how features of the fictitious DN2 service raise concerns about access and usability, privacy, risks & benefits, and data management. Our analysis also demonstrates how the design fiction method might be combined with frameworks for ethical thinking to generate insights about not-yet-possible technologies.

Conclusions:

There are potential ELSIs associated with system designs intended to assist older adults as they are exposed to misinformation through social media. Design fiction and the DHC-R offer a structured approach for identifying and speculating about these risks.


 Citation

Please cite as:

McInnis B, Eikey E, Moore RC, Wang S, Nebeker C

Digital News Navigator: A design fiction raising ethical considerations about systems that help older adults to recover from exposure to misinformation

JMIR Preprints. 15/04/2022:38795

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.38795

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/38795

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.