Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Apr 7, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 7, 2022 - Apr 21, 2022
Date Accepted: May 30, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Dynamic Regulatory Processes in the Transition from Suicidal Ideation to Action in Adults Leaving Inpatient Psychiatric Care: An Intensive Longitudinal Study Protocol
ABSTRACT
Background:
U.S. suicide rates have risen steadily in the past decade, and suicide risk is especially high in the months after discharge from inpatient psychiatric treatment. However, suicide research has lagged in examining dynamic, within-person processes that contribute to risk over time among high-risk individuals . Almost no research has examined how affective, cognitive, and physiological processes change over minutes, hours, or days to confer risk of suicidal behavior in daily life.
Objective:
This protocol describes a longitudinal study designed to examine real-world changes in risk of suicide across multiple assessment domains. Specifically, the study involves following high-risk adults after discharge from inpatient psychiatric care using self-report, interview, actigraphy, and behavioral methods to identify proximal contributors to suicidal thoughts and behaviors. First, we hypothesize that negative affective experiences, which are featured in most major suicide theories, will comprise a latent factor indicative of psychache (emotional pain), which will predict increases in suicidal thinking over time. Second, we hypothesize that poor inhibitory control in the context of negative affective stimuli, as well as emotion-related impulsivity, will predict the transition from suicidal thinking to suicidal behavior over time. Third, we hypothesize that short sleep duration will precede within-person increases in suicidal ideation as well as increased odds of suicidal behavior among those reporting suicidal thoughts.
Methods:
The desired sample size is 130 adults with past week suicidal thoughts or behaviors who are receiving inpatient psychiatric treatment. Participants complete a battery of measures while on the inpatient unit to assess negative affective experiences, emotion-related impulsivity, inhibitory control, typical sleep patterns, and relevant covariates. After discharge from inpatient care, participants complete four weeks of signal-contingent ecological momentary assessment surveys, as well as mobile behavioral measures of inhibitory control, while wearing an actigraphy device to gather objective data on sleep. Participants complete interviews about suicidal thoughts or behaviors at four and eight weeks post-discharge.
Results:
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health in November 2020. Recruitment began in April 2021. Data analysis will begin after completion of data collection.
Conclusions:
This study will elucidate how affective, cognitive, and physiological risk factors contribute to within-person fluctuations in suicide risk in daily life, with important implications for extant theories of suicide. Of import, the examined risk factors are all modifiable, and thus results will inform identification of key targets for just-in-time, flexible, personalized, digital interventions which can be used to decrease suffering and prevent suicide among those at highest risk.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.