Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Infodemiology

Date Submitted: Apr 7, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 27, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Information Sharing Behaviors of Dietitians and Twitter Users in the Nutrition and COVID-19 Infodemic: Content Analysis Study of Tweets

Charbonneau E, Mellouli S, Chouikh A, Couture LJ, Desroches S

The Information Sharing Behaviors of Dietitians and Twitter Users in the Nutrition and COVID-19 Infodemic: Content Analysis Study of Tweets

JMIR Infodemiology 2022;2(2):e38573

DOI: 10.2196/38573

PMID: 36188421

PMCID: 9511036

Dietitians’ and Twitter Users’ Information Sharing Behavior in the Nutrition and COVID-19 Infodemic: Content Analysis of Tweets

  • Esther Charbonneau; 
  • Sehl Mellouli; 
  • Arbi Chouikh; 
  • Laurie-Jane Couture; 
  • Sophie Desroches

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated an infodemic, an overabundance of online and offline information. In this context, accurate information as well as misinformation and disinformation about the links between nutrition and COVID-19 have circulated on Twitter since the onset of the pandemic.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to compare tweets on nutrition in times of COVID-19 published by two groups, a pre-identified group of dietitians and the general users of Twitter, in terms of their themes, content accuracy, use of behavior change factors and user engagement, in order to contrast their publication behavior during the pandemic.

Methods:

Public English-language tweets published between December 31st, 2019, and December 31st, 2020, by 625 dietitians from Canada and the United States, and Twitter users were collected using hashtags and keywords related to nutrition and COVID-19. After filtration, tweets were coded against an original codebook of themes and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), for identifying behavior change factors, and compared to reliable nutritional recommendations pertaining to COVID-19. The number of likes, replies, and retweets per tweet were also collected to determine user engagement.

Results:

In total, 2886 tweets (dietitians, n=1417; public, n=1469) were included in the analyses. Differences in frequency between groups were found in 11 themes out of 15. Grocery (n=271, 19.1%), as well as diets and dietary patterns (n=507, 34.1%) were the most frequently addressed themes by dietitians and the public, respectively. Differences in frequency between groups were found in 9 TDF domains out of 14. Skills was the most used domain by both groups although in significantly different proportions (dietitians: n=612, 21.2% vs public: n=529, 18.3%; P<.0001). A higher proportion of dietitians’ tweets were accurate compared to the public (n=532/575, 92.5% vs n=250/382, 65.5%; P<.0001). Results for user engagement were mitigated: while engagement by likes varied between groups according to themes, engagement by replies and retweets were similar across themes but varied according to groups.

Conclusions:

Differences in tweets between groups, notably ones related to content accuracy, themes, and engagement in the form of likes, shed light on potentially useful and relevant elements to include in timely social media interventions aiming at fighting the COVID-19-related or future infodemics.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Charbonneau E, Mellouli S, Chouikh A, Couture LJ, Desroches S

The Information Sharing Behaviors of Dietitians and Twitter Users in the Nutrition and COVID-19 Infodemic: Content Analysis Study of Tweets

JMIR Infodemiology 2022;2(2):e38573

DOI: 10.2196/38573

PMID: 36188421

PMCID: 9511036

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.