Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Apr 4, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 4, 2022 - May 30, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study

Strachna O, Asan O

Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(11):e38483

DOI: 10.2196/38483

PMID: 36326801

PMCID: 9672998

Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study

  • Olga Strachna; 
  • Onur Asan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Remote monitoring programs based on the collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) data are increasing in adoption within oncology practices.

Objective:

In a first-of-its-kind study, we sought to design, describe and evaluate a closed-loop alerting and communication system focused on managing PROs related alerts in cancer care.

Methods:

We designed and developed a novel solution using agile software development methodology by incrementally building new capabilities. We evaluated these new features using participatory design and the Fit between Individuals, Task, and Technology (FITT) framework.

Results:

Eight questionnaires were implemented using alerting features resulting in an alert rate of 7.8% (36,838/470,841) with 13.2% (10,965/82,544) patients triggering at least one alert. Alerts were reviewed by 501 staff spanning across 191 care teams. 100% of the alerts were reviewed with an average response time of 1 hour during standard business hours. The most severe (red) alerts were documented 57% of the time, compared to unlabeled alerts 28%, signaling clinician concordance with alert thresholds.

Conclusions:

A PRO-based alert and communication system has some initial benefits in reviewing clinically meaningful PROs data in a reasonable amount of time. We discuss key system design considerations, workflow integration and mitigating potential impact on care team burden. Introduction of a PROs based alert and communication system provides a reliable mechanism for care teams to review and respond to patient symptoms quickly. The system was standardized across many different oncology settings, demonstrating system flexibility. Future studies will focus on formally evaluating system usability through qualitative methods.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Strachna O, Asan O

Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(11):e38483

DOI: 10.2196/38483

PMID: 36326801

PMCID: 9672998

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.