Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Nov 16, 2022
Date Accepted: May 3, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 9, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Ontarians’ Perceptions of Public Health Communications and Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study

Fahim C, Cooper J, Theivendrampillai S, Pham B, Straus S

Ontarians’ Perceptions of Public Health Communications and Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e38323

DOI: 10.2196/38323

PMID: 37159394

PMCID: 10241226

Ontarians’ perceptions of public health communications and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study

  • Christine Fahim; 
  • Jeanette Cooper; 
  • Suvabna Theivendrampillai; 
  • Ba' Pham; 
  • Sharon Straus

ABSTRACT

Background:

Clear, accurate and transparent risk communication is critical to providing policy makers and the public with direction to reduce transmission and implement effective preparedness strategies during a health emergency.

Objective:

For those living in Canada, we aimed to explore preferred sources of obtaining COVID-19 information, perceptions on the prevalence and drivers of misinformation during the pandemic, and suggestions to optimize health communications during future public health emergencies.

Methods:

We administered an online survey to residents of Ontario, Canada and aimed to recruit a sample that reflected population diversity with respect to age and gender. Data were collected between June 10, 2020 – December 31, 2020.

Results:

A total of 1823 individuals participated in the survey (54% women, 39% men; 54% aged 18-40; 28% aged 41-60, 12% aged 61+). Participants most commonly obtained COVID-19 information from local television news (61%) followed by social media (51%), national/international television news (49%) and friends and family (46%). Approximately 55% of participants encountered misinformation. Participants reported high levels of trust in health authority websites and in healthcare providers; less trustworthy sources included friends and family, talk radio, social media, and blogs/opinion websites. Men were more likely to report encountering misinformation and to trust friends or family and blogs/opinion websites, compared to women. Compared to those aged 18-40 years, participants aged 41+ were more likely to trust all assessed information sources, with the exception of online media sources, and less likely to report encountering misinformation. Of those surveyed, 58% had challenges identifying or appraising COVID-19 information.

Conclusions:

Over half of our participants encountered misinformation while seeking COVID-19 information and 58% had challenges identifying or appraising COVID-19 information. Gender and age differences in perceptions of misinformation and trust in information sources were observed. Future research on patterns of information seeking by age and gender may provide useful insights on optimizing health communication during public health emergencies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fahim C, Cooper J, Theivendrampillai S, Pham B, Straus S

Ontarians’ Perceptions of Public Health Communications and Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e38323

DOI: 10.2196/38323

PMID: 37159394

PMCID: 10241226

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.