Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 28, 2022
Date Accepted: May 26, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing the Initial Validity of the PortionSize App to Estimate Dietary Intake Among Adults: Pilot and Feasibility App Validation Study

Saha S, Lozano CP, Broyles S, Martin CK, Apolzan JW

Assessing the Initial Validity of the PortionSize App to Estimate Dietary Intake Among Adults: Pilot and Feasibility App Validation Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(6):e38283

DOI: 10.2196/38283

PMID: 35704355

PMCID: 9244674

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessing validity of the PortionSize app to estimate dietary intake among adults: A pilot study

  • Sanjoy Saha; 
  • Chloe Panizza Lozano; 
  • Stephanie Broyles; 
  • Corby K Martin; 
  • John W Apolzan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Accurately assessing dietary intake can promote improved nutrition. The PortionSize© app is designed to quantify and provide real-time feedback on intake of energy, food groups, saturated fat, and added sugar.

Objective:

This study assessed the preliminary validity of estimating food intake using the PortionSize app among adults.

Methods:

Fifteen adults (18-65 years) were recruited and trained to quantify food intake from a simulated meal using PortionSize. Trained personnel prepared 15 simulated meals and covertly weighed (weigh back [WB]) the amount of food provided to participants, as well as food waste. Equivalence tests (+/- 25% bounds) were performed to compare PortionSize to WB.

Results:

Participants were 28 ± 12 years (Mean ± SD) and 73.3% female. Mean energy intake (EI) estimated with PortionSize was 742.9 ± 328.2 kcal and WB was 659.3 ± 190.7 kcal (mean EI difference, 83.5 ± 287.5 kcal). The methods were not equivalent in estimating EI (P = .18), and PortionSize overestimated EI by 83.5 kcal (12.7%) at the meal level. Estimates of portion size (gram weight), total sugar, fruit, and dairy servings with PortionSize were equivalent to WB (all P values < .05). PortionSize was not equivalent to WB for carbohydrate, fat, vegetables, grain, and protein servings (all P values > .05).

Conclusions:

Due to power limitations, the equivalence tests had large equivalence bounds. Though preliminary, the results of this small pilot study warrant further development and validation of PortionSize as means to estimate EI and provide users with real time and actionable feedback. Clinical Trial: Registered at ClinicalTrails.gov (NCT04494971); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04494971


 Citation

Please cite as:

Saha S, Lozano CP, Broyles S, Martin CK, Apolzan JW

Assessing the Initial Validity of the PortionSize App to Estimate Dietary Intake Among Adults: Pilot and Feasibility App Validation Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(6):e38283

DOI: 10.2196/38283

PMID: 35704355

PMCID: 9244674

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.