Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 25, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 25, 2022 - May 20, 2022
Date Accepted: Jun 20, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jul 11, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

COVID-box Experiences of Patients and Health Care Professionals (COVID-box Project): Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study

Dirikgil E, Brons K, Duindam M, Groeneveld GH, Geelhoed JM, Heringhaus C, van der Boog PJ, Rabelink TJ, Bos WJW, Chavannes NH, Atsma DE, Teng Y

COVID-box Experiences of Patients and Health Care Professionals (COVID-box Project): Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(7):e38263

DOI: 10.2196/38263

PMID: 35816688

PMCID: 9337621

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

COVID-box experiences of patients and healthcare professionals: COVID-box project

  • Ebru Dirikgil; 
  • Kim Brons; 
  • Michael Duindam; 
  • Geert H. Groeneveld; 
  • J.J. Miranda Geelhoed; 
  • Christian Heringhaus; 
  • Paul J.M. van der Boog; 
  • Ton J. Rabelink; 
  • Willem Jan W. Bos; 
  • Niels H. Chavannes; 
  • Douwe E. Atsma; 
  • Y.K.Onno Teng

ABSTRACT

Background:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, several home-monitoring programs have described the success of reducing hospital admissions, but only a few studies investigated the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to determine the patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perception on the usefulness of the COVID-box.

Methods:

Patients and healthcare professionals were asked to anonymously fill out multiple choice questionnaires. Themes for patients were sense of reassurance and safety, experience with teleconsultations, appreciation to stay at home and the instructions for the COVID-box, and themes for healthcare professionals who treated patients with the COVID-box were characteristics of the COVID-box, support service and the general point of view such as (estimated patient) satisfaction, meeting expectations and supporting this telemonitoring concept.

Results:

A total of 117 patients and 25 healthcare professionals filled out the questionnaires. Both groups scored high on all themes.

Conclusions:

Positive experiences and satisfaction of involved users are key factors for a successful implementation of novel e-health solution. In our study, patients as well as healthcare professionals were highly satisfied with the use of the home-monitoring program, the COVID-box project. Remote home-monitoring may be an effective approach in case of increased demand for hospital care and high pressure on healthcare systems.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dirikgil E, Brons K, Duindam M, Groeneveld GH, Geelhoed JM, Heringhaus C, van der Boog PJ, Rabelink TJ, Bos WJW, Chavannes NH, Atsma DE, Teng Y

COVID-box Experiences of Patients and Health Care Professionals (COVID-box Project): Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(7):e38263

DOI: 10.2196/38263

PMID: 35816688

PMCID: 9337621

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.