Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since May 26, 2022)
Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 21, 2022 - May 16, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Application of quantitative methods to selection of rhythm management strategies in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: a retrospective observational study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Decisions regarding initial rhythm management strategy for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) are challenging to individualize. Prior work by our team has demonstrated feasibility of using machine learning algorithms at the level of diagnostic codes to predict rhythm management strategies; however, this work did not examine prediction models at the individual level.
Objective:
We aimed to examine decisions about rhythm management for AF and associated outcomes at the individual patient level, through mapping clinical trajectories within the electronic health record. We examined use of quantitative methods to predict the use of rate- or rhythm-control therapy in patients with a new diagnosis of AF.
Methods:
We performed a targeted chart review of patients with a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in the University of Colorado healthcare system from 2011 to 2020. We used clinical and demographic information to develop and test machine learning algorithms for predicting initial rhythm management strategy, and compared models based on accuracy as well as interpretability. Time-to-event and regression analyses were performed to predict the likelihood of change in rhythm management and the risk of subsequent hospitalization or death.
Results:
Of 419 patients with an EHR-diagnosis of new AF, we confirmed the diagnosis in 289 patients, 194 of whom we classified as paroxysmal and 95 persistent. For all patients with AF, rhythm-control therapy resulted in more total management changes. For paroxysmal AF, rhythm-control therapy resulted in fewer hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.34) and no difference in mortality compared to rate-control therapy. For persistent AF, rhythm control resulted in more hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio 2.44, 95% CI 1.41-4.22) with no difference in mortality. Machine learning models could predict the initial strategy with limited accuracy, which was higher in patients with persistent than paroxysmal AF.
Conclusions:
Quantitative decision models for rhythm management of AF can be developed through trajectory mapping using chart review. Discussion about patient-centered outcomes should be considered when selecting initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. Clinical Trial: n/a
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.