Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 4, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Design and Formative Evaluation of a Virtual Voice-Based Coach for Problem-solving Treatment: Observational Study

Kannampallil T, Ronneberg CR, Wittels NE, Kumar V, Lv N, Smyth JM, Gerber BS, Kringle EA, Johnson JA, Yu P, Steinman LE, Ajilore OA, Ma J

Design and Formative Evaluation of a Virtual Voice-Based Coach for Problem-solving Treatment: Observational Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(8):e38092

DOI: 10.2196/38092

PMID: 35969431

PMCID: 9419044

Design and Formative Evaluation of a Virtual Voice-based Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment: An Observational Study

  • Thomas Kannampallil; 
  • Corina R. Ronneberg; 
  • Nancy E. Wittels; 
  • Vikas Kumar; 
  • Nan Lv; 
  • Joshua M. Smyth; 
  • Ben S. Gerber; 
  • Emily A. Kringle; 
  • Jillian A. Johnson; 
  • Philip Yu; 
  • Lesley E. Steinman; 
  • Olu A. Ajilore; 
  • Jun Ma

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has afforded new opportunities for human interactions with technology for the practice of medicine. However, the use of voice-based AI technology for behavioral therapy has not been previously evaluated.

Objective:

We describe the design and user evaluation of LumenTM, voice-only virtual coach, developed as an Alexa skill, that delivers evidence-based, problem-solving treatment (PST) for patients with mild-to-moderate depression and/or anxiety.

Methods:

Participants (N=26) completed two therapy sessions—an introductory (S1) and a problem-solving (S2)—with Lumen. Following each session, participants completed (a) user experience, task-related workload, and work alliance surveys, and (b) semi-structured interviews addressing the benefits, challenges and barriers to Lumen use, and design recommendations. We evaluated the differences in the user experience, task load or work alliance between sessions using paired t tests. Interview transcripts were coded using an inductive thematic analysis to characterize the participant perspectives.

Results:

Participants found Lumen to provide high pragmatic usability and favorable user experience, with marginal task load during interactions for both Lumen sessions. However, participants rated as having experienced higher temporal workload during the problem-solving session, suggesting feeling rushed during their interaction. Based on the qualitative analysis, the following themes were identified: Lumen’s on-demand accessibility and the delivery of a complex PST task with a simplistic structure for achieving therapy goal; themes related to Lumen improvements included streamlining and improved personalization of conversations, slower pacing of conversations, and providing additional context during therapy sessions.

Conclusions:

Lumen offers a cognitively-plausible interactions that can potentially lead to personalized and accessible mental health care, filling a gap in traditional mental health services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kannampallil T, Ronneberg CR, Wittels NE, Kumar V, Lv N, Smyth JM, Gerber BS, Kringle EA, Johnson JA, Yu P, Steinman LE, Ajilore OA, Ma J

Design and Formative Evaluation of a Virtual Voice-Based Coach for Problem-solving Treatment: Observational Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(8):e38092

DOI: 10.2196/38092

PMID: 35969431

PMCID: 9419044

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.