Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Mar 16, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 16, 2022 - May 11, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 10, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 12, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Assessing the clinical and socio-economic burden of RSV in children under 5 years in primary care: Protocol for a prospective cohort study in England and report on adaptations of the study to the COVID-19 pandemic
ABSTRACT
Background:
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) commonly causes lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and hospitalisation in children. In 2019/20, the Europe-wide RSV ComNet standardised study protocol was developed to measure the clinical and socio-economic disease burden of RSV infections amongst children <5 years of age in primary care. RSV has a recognised seasonality in England.
Objective:
We describe adaptations of RSV ComNet standardised study protocol for England, and the challenges of conducting the study during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods:
The study is being conducted by the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC), the English national primary care sentinel network. We will invite all general practices within the network that undertake virology sampling (N=248 general practices, registered population 3,056,583) to participate in the study by recruiting eligible patients. Children <5 years old with the following case definition of RSV infection will be included in the study:, consulting a health care practitioner in primary care with symptoms meeting the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) definition of acute respiratory illness (ARI) or influenza like illness (ILI), who have laboratory confirmed RSV infection. Parents/guardians of cases will be asked to complete two, previously validated, questionnaires (day 14 and 30 post-sampling). We require a sample of at least 100 RSV+ cases to estimate the percentage of children that consult in primary care who need hospitalization. Assuming a swab positivity rate of 20% in children <5 years, we estimate we require 500 swabs. We have adapted our method for the pandemic by extending sampling planned for winter 2020/2021 to a rolling data collection, allowing verbal consent and introducing home-swabbing because of increased virtual consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results:
Preliminary results of the data collection between ISO weeks 1 to 41 2021 are described. There was no RSV detected in the winter of 2020/2021 through the study. The first positive RSV swab collected through the sentinel network in England was collected in International Standards Organisation (ISO) week 17, 2021 and then every week since ISO week 25. 16 (16/248-6.5%) of the virology sampling practices volunteered to participate. These 16 practices are high sampling practices collecting the majority of eligible swabs across the sentinel network, namely 200 out of the 457 swabs (43.8%) of which 54 (27%) were positive for RSV.
Conclusions:
Measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic meant there was no circulating RSV last winter, however RSV has circulated out of season, detected by the sentinel network. Whilst the sentinel network practices have collected 40% (200/500) of the required samples and 27% (54200) were RSV positive. We have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a European-standardised RSV Disease Burden study protocol in England during a pandemic, and now need to recruit to this adapted protocol. Clinical Trial: Not applicable
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.