Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 10, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 25, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Diabetic-Related Retinopathy Screening Engagement by Patients in a Team-Based Primary Care Practice: Prospective, Single-Masked, Randomized Trial

Stamenova V, Nguyen M, Onabajo N, Merritt R, Sutakovic O, Mossman K, Wong I, Ives-Baine L, Bhatia RS, Brent M, Bhattacharyya O

Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Diabetic-Related Retinopathy Screening Engagement by Patients in a Team-Based Primary Care Practice: Prospective, Single-Masked, Randomized Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e37867

DOI: 10.2196/37867

PMID: 36630160

PMCID: 9878360

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Mailed letter versus phone call to increase diabetic retinopathy screening engagement by patients in a team-based primary care practice: a prospective, single-masked, randomized trial.

  • Vess Stamenova; 
  • Megan Nguyen; 
  • Nike Onabajo; 
  • Rebecca Merritt; 
  • Olivera Sutakovic; 
  • Kate Mossman; 
  • Ivy Wong; 
  • Lori Ives-Baine; 
  • R. Sacha Bhatia; 
  • Michael Brent; 
  • Onil Bhattacharyya

ABSTRACT

Background:

Vision loss from diabetic retinopathy (DR) is preventable through regular screening.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to test different patient engagement approaches to expand a teleophthalmology program at a primary care clinic in the city of Toronto, Canada.

Methods:

A teleophthalmology program was set up in a large urban academic team-based primary care practice. Patients over 18 years of age, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were randomized to one of four engagement strategies: a phone call, a letter, a letter plus phone call, or usual care. Outreach was conducted by administrative staff within the clinic. The primary outcome was booking an appointment

Results:

Twenty three patients in the phone, 28 in the mail, 32 in the mail and phone, and 27 in the control (usual care) were included in the analysis. After the intervention, 88% of patients in the phone, 11% in the mail, and 100% in the mail and phone group booked an appointment with the teleophthalmology program compared to 0% in the control group. Phoning patients positively predicted patients booking a teleophthalmology appointment (p< .0001), while sending a letter had no effect.

Conclusions:

Patient engagement to book DR screening via teleophthalmology in an urban academic team-based primary care practice using telephone calls was much more effective than letters or usual care. Practices that have access to a local DR screening programs and have resources for such engagement strategies should consider using them as a means in improving their DR screening rates.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Stamenova V, Nguyen M, Onabajo N, Merritt R, Sutakovic O, Mossman K, Wong I, Ives-Baine L, Bhatia RS, Brent M, Bhattacharyya O

Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Diabetic-Related Retinopathy Screening Engagement by Patients in a Team-Based Primary Care Practice: Prospective, Single-Masked, Randomized Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e37867

DOI: 10.2196/37867

PMID: 36630160

PMCID: 9878360

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.