Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
Date Submitted: Mar 3, 2022
Date Accepted: Jun 28, 2022
mHealth technology design and evaluation for early childhood health promotion: A systematic literature review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Recent increases in smartphone ownership among underserved populations have inspired researchers in medicine, computing, and health informatics to design and evaluate mobile health (mHealth) interventions, specifically for those supporting child development and growth. While these interventions demonstrate possible effectiveness at larger scales, few of these interventions are evaluated to address racial disparities and health equity, which are known factors that affect relevance, uptake, and adherence in target populations.
Objective:
In this study, we aimed to identify and document the current design and evaluation practices of mobile health technologies that promote early childhood health, with a specific focus on opportunities for those processes to address health disparities and health equity.
Methods:
To survey the current design and evaluation methods of current work, identify opportunities to address racial disparities in early- and late-stage processes, and understand the potential efficacy of these interventions, we completed a systematic literature review of studies that design and evaluate mHealth interventions for early childhood health promotion.
Results:
Across literature from medical, computing, and health informatics venues, we identified 15 papers that presented a design or evaluation of a parent-facing health intervention. We found that using mobile-based systems to deliver health interventions was generally well accepted for parents of children under age five. We also found that, when measured, parenting knowledge of early childhood health topics and confidence to engage in health-promoting behaviors improved. Design and evaluation methods held internal consistency within disciplines (e.g., experimental study designs were most prevalent in medical literature, while computing researchers used user-centered design methods in computing venues). However, there was little consistency in design or evaluation methods across venues.
Conclusions:
To support more interventions undergoing a comprehensive design and evaluation process, we recommend attention to design at the intervention level (e.g., reporting content sources) and at the system level; interdisciplinary collaboration in early childhood health intervention development can lead to large-scale deployment and success among populations.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.