Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 24, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 20, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation

Brammall BR, Garad RM, Boyle JA, Hayman MJ, de Jersey SJ, Teede HJ, Hong QV, Carrandi A, Harrison CL

Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(11):e37552

DOI: 10.2196/37552

PMID: 36427237

PMCID: 9736757

Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Search and Evaluation

  • Bonnie R Brammall; 
  • Rhonda M Garad; 
  • Jacqueline A Boyle; 
  • Melanie J Hayman; 
  • Susan J de Jersey; 
  • Helena J Teede; 
  • Quoc V Hong; 
  • Alayna Carrandi; 
  • Cheryce L Harrison

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimising gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the quality, credibility, safety and potential for health-related behaviour change of publicly available digital health tools that promote GWG management.

Methods:

Digital tools were identified using key search terms across website search engines and application stores and evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), the App Behaviour Change Scale (ABACUS) as well as criteria to evaluate the rigor and safety of GWG information.

Results:

Overall, 1,085 tools were screened for inclusion (n=162 websites and n=923 apps) and 19 were deemed eligible. The mean MARS quality score was 3.31 (0.53) out of 5, ranging from 2.26 to 4.39 and the mean ABACUS score was 6 (3.4) out of 21 ranging from 19 to 0. Of 19 items to evaluate rigour of GWG advice, the majority of tools (n=11, 57.9%) contained three items or less overall.

Conclusions:

This review emphasises significant limitations in current digital resources promoting monitoring and optimisation for GWG. The majority of tools were of low quality, had minimal behaviour change potential and were potentially unsafe, with minimal linkage to evidence-based information or partnership with healthcare.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Brammall BR, Garad RM, Boyle JA, Hayman MJ, de Jersey SJ, Teede HJ, Hong QV, Carrandi A, Harrison CL

Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(11):e37552

DOI: 10.2196/37552

PMID: 36427237

PMCID: 9736757

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.