Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 23, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 23, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Circulating Illness and Changes in Thermometer Use Behavior: Series of Cross-sectional Analyses

Seifarth J, Pinaire M, Zicker J, Singh I, Bloch D

Circulating Illness and Changes in Thermometer Use Behavior: Series of Cross-sectional Analyses

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(9):e37509

DOI: 10.2196/37509

PMID: 35998174

PMCID: 9506504

Circulating Illness and Changes in Thermometer Use Behavior: Series of Cross-sectional Analyses

  • Jack Seifarth; 
  • Megan Pinaire; 
  • John Zicker; 
  • Inder Singh; 
  • Danielle Bloch

ABSTRACT

Background:

Temperature-taking behaviors vary with levels of circulating infectious illness; however, little is known about how these behaviors differ by demographic characteristics.

Objective:

We investigated differences in temperature-taking frequency and the proportion of readings that were feverish among demographic groups (age, gender, urban/rural status) over influenza offseason, influenza season, and Waves 1, 2, and 3 of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

Using data from smart thermometers collected from May 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021, across the United States, we calculated the frequency of temperature-taking and the proportion of temperature readings that were feverish. Mixed effects negative binomial and mixed effects logistic regression analyses were performed to identify demographic characteristics associated with temperature-taking frequency and the proportion of feverish readings, respectively. Separate models were fit over five study periods: influenza offseason (n=122,480), influenza season (n=174,191), Wave 1 of COVID-19 (n=350,385), Wave 2 (n=366,489), and Wave 3 (n=391,578).

Results:

Both temperature-taking frequency and the proportion of feverish readings differed by study period (ANOVA: P<.001) and were highest during influenza season. During all periods, children aged 2-5 years and 6-11 years had significantly higher frequencies of temperature-taking than users aged 19-30 years, and children had the highest proportion of feverish readings of all age groups, after adjusting for covariates. During Wave 1 of COVID-19, users over age 60 years had 1.79 times (95% CI: 1.76, 1.83) the rate of temperature-taking as users aged 19-30 years, and 74% lower odds (95% CI: 72-75%) of a reading being feverish. Across all periods, males had significantly lower temperature-taking frequency and significantly higher odds of having a feverish reading compared to females. Users living in urban areas had significantly higher frequencies of temperature-taking than rural users during all periods, except Wave 2 of COVID-19, and urban users had higher odds of a reading being feverish in all study periods except Wave 1 of COVID-19.

Conclusions:

Temperature-taking behavior and the proportion of readings that were feverish are associated with both population disease levels and individual demographic characteristics. Differences in the health behavior of temperature-taking may reflect changes in both perceived and actual illness risk. Specifically, older adults may have experienced an increase in perceived risk during the first three waves of COVID-19, leading to increased rates of temperature monitoring, even when their odds of fever were lower than younger adults.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Seifarth J, Pinaire M, Zicker J, Singh I, Bloch D

Circulating Illness and Changes in Thermometer Use Behavior: Series of Cross-sectional Analyses

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(9):e37509

DOI: 10.2196/37509

PMID: 35998174

PMCID: 9506504

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.