Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Feb 22, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 25, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 1, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Considering Clinician Competencies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools in Health Care: Findings From a Scoping Review

Garvey KV, Thomas Craig KJ, Russell R, Novak LL, Moore D, Miller BM

Considering Clinician Competencies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools in Health Care: Findings From a Scoping Review

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(11):e37478

DOI: 10.2196/37478

PMID: 36318697

PMCID: 9713618

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Implementation Studies for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Tools in Healthcare Should Include Human Learning Considerations: Negative Findings from a Scoping Review

  • Kim V Garvey; 
  • Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; 
  • Regina Russell; 
  • Laurie L Novak; 
  • Don Moore; 
  • Bonnie M Miller

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools in the care of individual patients and patient populations is rapidly expanding.

Objective:

To systematically identify research on provider competencies needed for use of AI in clinical settings.

Methods:

A scoping review was conducted to identify articles published between January 1, 2009 and May 1, 2020 from MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases, using search queries for terms related to healthcare professionals (e.g., medical, nursing, and pharmacy) and their professional development in all phases of clinical education, AI-based tools in all settings of clinical practice, and professional education domains of competencies and performance. Limits were provided for English language, studies in humans with abstracts, and settings in the United States.

Results:

The searches identified 3,476 records, of which four met inclusion criteria. These studies described use of AI in clinical practice and measured at least one aspect of clinician competence. While many studies measured the performance of the AI-based tool, only four measured clinician performance in terms of the knowledge, skills, or attitudes needed to understand and effectively use the new tools being tested. These four articles primarily focused on the ability of AI to enhance patient care and clinical decision-making by improving information flow and display, specifically for physicians.

Conclusions:

While many research studies were identified that investigate the potential effectiveness of using AI technologies in healthcare, very few address the necessary integration within human systems and educational frameworks. This highlights a critical gap.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Garvey KV, Thomas Craig KJ, Russell R, Novak LL, Moore D, Miller BM

Considering Clinician Competencies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools in Health Care: Findings From a Scoping Review

JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(11):e37478

DOI: 10.2196/37478

PMID: 36318697

PMCID: 9713618

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.