Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Feb 17, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 17, 2022 - Apr 14, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 7, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Systematic Review

Zlamal J, Roth Gjevjon E, Fossum M, Trygg Solberg M, Steindal SA, Strandell-Laine C, Hamilton Larsen M, Nes AAG

Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Systematic Review

JMIR Nursing 2022;5(1):e37380

DOI: 10.2196/37380

PMID: 35671078

PMCID: 9214617

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review

  • Jaroslav Zlamal; 
  • Edith Roth Gjevjon; 
  • Mariann Fossum; 
  • Marianne Trygg Solberg; 
  • Simen A. Steindal; 
  • Camilla Strandell-Laine; 
  • Marie Hamilton Larsen; 
  • Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes

ABSTRACT

Background:

Nursing education has increasingly focused on critical thinking among nursing students, as critical thinking is a desired outcome of nursing education. Particular attention is given to the potential of technological tools in guiding nursing students to stimulate the development of critical thinking, but the general landscape, facilitators and challenges of these guidance models remain unexplored, and no previous mixed methods systematic review on the subject has been identified.

Objective:

This study aimed to synthetise the existing evidence on technology-supported guidance models used in nursing education to stimulate the development of critical thinking in nursing students in clinical practice.

Methods:

This mixed methods systematic review adopted a convergent integrated design to facilitate thematic synthesis. The study follows the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis.

Results:

We identified three analytical themes: learning processes implemented to stimulate critical thinking, organisation of the learning process to stimulate critical thinking and factors influencing the perception of the learning process. We also identified four guidance models, all based on facilitator/preceptorship models using tailored instructional or learning strategies and one or several technological tools, which were either generic or custom made for specific outcomes. The main facilitators of these technology-supported guidance models were nurse educators or nurse preceptors, and the main challenges in using technology-supported guidance models were the stress associated with technical difficulties or with an increased cognitive load.

Conclusions:

Although we were able to identify four technology-supported guidance models, our results indicate a research gap regarding the use of these models in nursing education with the specific aim of stimulating the development of critical thinking. Both nurse preceptors and nurse educators play a crucial role in the development of critical thinking among nursing students, and technology is essential for such development. However, technology-supported guidance models should be supervised to mitigate the associated stress.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zlamal J, Roth Gjevjon E, Fossum M, Trygg Solberg M, Steindal SA, Strandell-Laine C, Hamilton Larsen M, Nes AAG

Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Systematic Review

JMIR Nursing 2022;5(1):e37380

DOI: 10.2196/37380

PMID: 35671078

PMCID: 9214617

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.