Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2022
Date Accepted: Jun 21, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

How Community-Based Teams Use the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Longitudinal Qualitative Field Test Study

Reszel J, van den Hoek J, Nguyen T, Aravind G, Bayley MT, Bird ML, Edwards K, Eng JJ, Moore JL, Nelson ML, Ploughman M, Richardson J, Salbach NM, Tang A, Graham ID

How Community-Based Teams Use the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Longitudinal Qualitative Field Test Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(7):e37243

DOI: 10.2196/37243

PMID: 35904855

PMCID: 9377454

Part 2: How community-based teams used the Stroke Recovery in Motion implementation planner – A field test study

  • Jessica Reszel; 
  • Joan van den Hoek; 
  • Tram Nguyen; 
  • Gayatri Aravind; 
  • Mark T Bayley; 
  • Marie-Louise Bird; 
  • Kate Edwards; 
  • Janice J Eng; 
  • Jennifer L Moore; 
  • Michelle LA Nelson; 
  • Michelle Ploughman; 
  • Julie Richardson; 
  • Nancy M Salbach; 
  • Ada Tang; 
  • Ian D Graham

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Stroke Recovery in Motion “Planner” guides teams through the process of planning for the implementation of community-based exercise programs for people with stroke, in alignment with implementation science frameworks.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to conduct a field-test with end-users to: 1) describe how teams used the Planner in real-world conditions; 2) describe the effects of Planner use on participants' implementation planning knowledge, attitudes, and activities; and 3) identify factors influencing use of the Planner.

Methods:

This field-test study used a longitudinal qualitative design. We recruited teams across Canada who intended to implement a community-based exercise program for people with stroke in the next 6-12 months and were willing to use the Planner to guide their work. We completed semi-structured interviews at time of enrollment, monitoring calls every 1-2 months, and at end-of-study to learn about implementation planning work completed and Planner use. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Completed Planner steps were plotted onto a timeline for comparison across teams.

Results:

We enrolled 12 participants (program managers/coordinators, rehabilitation professionals, fitness professionals) from five planning teams. Teams were enrolled in the study between 4-14 months and in total, we conducted 25 interviews. We observed that teams worked through the planning process in diverse and non-linear ways, adapted to their context. All teams provided examples of how using the Planner changed their implementation planning knowledge (e.g., knowing the steps), attitudes (e.g., valuing community engagement), and activities (e.g., hosting stakeholder meetings). We identified team, organizational, and broader contextual factors that hindered and facilitated uptake of the Planner. Participants shared valuable “tips from the field” to help future teams optimize use of the Planner.

Conclusions:

The Stroke Recovery in Motion Planner is an adaptable resource that may be used in diverse settings to plan community-based exercise programs for people with stroke. These findings may be informative to others who are developing resources to build the capacity of those working in community-based settings to implement new programs and practices. Future work is needed to monitor use and understand the effect of using the Planner on exercise program implementation and sustainability.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Reszel J, van den Hoek J, Nguyen T, Aravind G, Bayley MT, Bird ML, Edwards K, Eng JJ, Moore JL, Nelson ML, Ploughman M, Richardson J, Salbach NM, Tang A, Graham ID

How Community-Based Teams Use the Stroke Recovery in Motion Implementation Planner: Longitudinal Qualitative Field Test Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(7):e37243

DOI: 10.2196/37243

PMID: 35904855

PMCID: 9377454

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.