Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 23, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 31, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 23, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Perspectives on Value Dimensions of Lung Cancer Care: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey

Müller B, Varriale P, Katz G, Dallas L, Aguaron A, Azoulai M, Potenciano L, Girard N

Patient Perspectives on Value Dimensions of Lung Cancer Care: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e37190

DOI: 10.2196/37190

PMID: 36416499

PMCID: 9912155

Patient perspective on value dimensions of lung cancer care: A cross-sectional online survey.

  • Borna Müller; 
  • Pasquale Varriale; 
  • Grégory Katz; 
  • Lorraine Dallas; 
  • Alfonso Aguaron; 
  • Marion Azoulai; 
  • Lilet Potenciano; 
  • Nicolas Girard

ABSTRACT

Background:

Current literature indicates that the disease progression harms the quality of life (QoL) of patients with lung cancer (LC). While the LC treatment landscape has rapidly evolved in recent years, easing symptom burden and treatment side effects remains a central consideration in disease control.

Objective:

The study aimed to assess the relative importance of dimensions of LC care to patients and caregivers and to explore the disease burden including economic aspects not commonly covered in patient-reported outcomes.

Methods:

A questionnaire was sent to LC patients and caregivers to assess how they value quality of life dimensions in care, assess communication between health care professionals and patients/caregivers, and evaluate economic impact on respondents. The questionnaire was based on commonly used patient­reported outcomes instruments for Quality of life evaluation (FACT-L, EQ5D, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13), as well as the ICHOM standard set of patient-centred outcomes for lung cancer. The survey’s respondents were participants on Carenity’s platform living in either France, UK, Germany, Italy, or Spain.

Results:

The survey included 150 respondents (77% patients, 33% caregivers). “Physical well-being” and “End-of-life care” (median score of 9.6 [7.7-10] and 9.7 [8.0-10]) were the most important dimension for the patients. “Physical well-being and functioning” was the dimension most frequently discussed with health care professionals (55%), while only 17% reported discussing “End­of-life care.” Among patients younger than 65 years, 43% stopped working after diagnosis. Among respondents that indicated their monthly household income before and after diagnosis, 55% reported a loss of income.

Conclusions:

This study underscores the importance of Quality-of-life priorities for LC patients care. It confirms LC care must consider patients’ psychological distress, desire to maintain independence, and ability to remain physically functional. It highlights the need for enhanced communication between patients and health care providers around healthcare priority and End­of-life care. It also highlights the disease’s considerable socio-economic impact on patients and caregivers, despite insurance coverage of direct costs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Müller B, Varriale P, Katz G, Dallas L, Aguaron A, Azoulai M, Potenciano L, Girard N

Patient Perspectives on Value Dimensions of Lung Cancer Care: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e37190

DOI: 10.2196/37190

PMID: 36416499

PMCID: 9912155

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.