Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Feb 3, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 20, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

From the Cochrane Library: Hydrosurgical Debridement Versus Conventional Surgical Debridement for Acute Partial-Thickness Burns

Kokoska RE, Szeto MD, Sivesind TE, Dellavalle RP, Wormald JCR

From the Cochrane Library: Hydrosurgical Debridement Versus Conventional Surgical Debridement for Acute Partial-Thickness Burns

JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(2):e37030

DOI: 10.2196/37030

PMID: 37632860

PMCID: 10334889

From the Cochrane Library: Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial-thickness burns

  • Ryan E Kokoska; 
  • Mindy D Szeto; 
  • Torunn E Sivesind; 
  • Robert P Dellavalle; 
  • Justin C R Wormald

ABSTRACT

N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kokoska RE, Szeto MD, Sivesind TE, Dellavalle RP, Wormald JCR

From the Cochrane Library: Hydrosurgical Debridement Versus Conventional Surgical Debridement for Acute Partial-Thickness Burns

JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(2):e37030

DOI: 10.2196/37030

PMID: 37632860

PMCID: 10334889

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.