Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Nov 20, 2022)

Date Submitted: Jan 31, 2022

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Systematic Review: Assessing the Gap between Suicide Safety Planning Research and Mobile Apps for Suicide Prevention

  • Marissa Joy McNeil; 
  • Kim Gryglewicz; 
  • Serenea Hines; 
  • Taylor L Duffy; 
  • Marcus D Seigman; 
  • Sairam Nalla; 
  • Lindsay A Taliaferro; 
  • Pamela J Wisniewski

ABSTRACT

Background:

Safety planning is an evidence-based suicide prevention approach used to help individuals identify strategies to keep themselves safe during mental health crises. Researchers and app developers have made significant strides in conducting empirical user studies on the design, development, and evaluation of mHealth applications (“apps”) for suicide safety planning. Yet, it is unclear whether insights from research are well-aligned with the apps currently available on the market.

Objective:

This study systematically reviews both the literature regarding suicide prevention technologies, as well as the mHealth apps available for download to assess gaps between research and practice.

Methods:

We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) review of 18 studies related to suicide safety planning technologies, combined with an in-depth feature analysis of 21 mobile apps available on the iOS and Android app stores. From the literature we identified best practice guidelines for the design and development of suicide safety planning apps. Then, we benchmarked these recommendations against available apps to identify gaps and opportunities for aligning future safety planning mHealth apps with evidence-based guidelines from the literature.

Results:

Three hundred and forty-seven apps referring to suicide were downloaded for review, of which 21 included at least 3 components of safety planning. Most applications included features that helped to identify 1) support persons (100%; n=21), 2) coping strategies (95%; n=20), and 3) warning signs (86%; n=18), but fewer supported psychosocial education on lethal means safety (48%; n=10) and allowed for patients to download or share (43%; n=9) their safety plans. Our review of the literature identified five main design recommendation categories: 1) Personalization, 2) Key Safety Planning Components, 3) Simplicity of Design, 4) Guidance and Training, and 5) Privacy and Security. Most of the apps (86%) provided a customizable safety plan specific to the user as well as provided users access to location-based support services (71%), but fewer included other advanced components, such as the ability to upload personal photos (14%), view inspirational quotes (5%), or enable mood tracking (5%). Of the apps reviewed, we also report target user demographics, collaboration and privacy considerations, and other emergent themes based on our dataset.

Conclusions:

Overall, our study highlights the need for researchers, clinicians, and app developers to work together to align evidence-based research on mHealth apps for suicide safety planning with best practices being used to deliver these technologies to end users. Our review also brings to light mHealth safety planning strategies needing further development and testing, such as lethal means guidance, collaborative safety planning, and features to facilitate app usage and engagement in coping behaviors. Although preliminary evidence shows that safety planning apps may help to mitigate suicide risk, clinical trials are needed to further test their efficacy, specifically with diverse and high-risk populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

McNeil MJ, Gryglewicz K, Hines S, Duffy TL, Seigman MD, Nalla S, Taliaferro LA, Wisniewski PJ

A Systematic Review: Assessing the Gap between Suicide Safety Planning Research and Mobile Apps for Suicide Prevention

JMIR Preprints. 31/01/2022:36944

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.36944

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/36944

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.