Previously submitted to: JMIR Perioperative Medicine (no longer under consideration since Feb 11, 2022)
Date Submitted: Jan 31, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 31, 2022 - Feb 11, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Efficiency and Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications as a Patient Perioperative Data Reporting System
ABSTRACT
Background:
One aspect that is highly developed is the technology sector, along with advances in information and communication technology, making the conventional service system that has been applied in government agencies has shifted to an electronic-based service system. This is in line with Presidential Instruction No. 3 of 2003 concerning e-Government Development Policies and Strategies. Information technology has revolutionized every sector of society, including the health sector. E-Health was introduced in the healthcare industry to improve access and flow of information, as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of patient care.In 2017, the Universitas Sumatera Utara (USU) for the first time participated in the international ranking for Green Campuses, "UI Green Metric". This was marked by the signing of a joint commitment by the Vice Chancellor IV of USU with the leaders of universities in Indonesia. so that this application is expected to support USU's green campus program in order to support the creation of an environmentally friendly hospital system. This study aims to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of smartphone applications as a patient perioperative data reporting system.
Objective:
We hope that this application will be able to be used as a tool that is sufficient to help the medical community in daily dealing with patients during preoperative. And it is expected to minimize the use of waste in the form of paper so that the long-term goal will be to create an environmentally friendly system for hospitals, because it uses Paperless Documentation. On the patient side, this application is useful for the speed and accuracy of patient assistance which ultimately refers to patient safety.
Methods:
The user experience questionnaire contains six scales with a total of 26 items: 1) Attractiveness: General impression of the product. Do users like or dislike the product? This scale is a pure valence dimension. Items: annoying/pleasant, good/bad, disliked/pleasant, unpleasant/pleasant, attractive/unattractive, friendly/unfriendly. 2) Efficiency: Is it possible to use the product quickly and efficiently? Does the user interface look organized? Items: fast/slow, inefficient/efficient, impractical/practical, organized/messy. 3) Clarity: Is it easy to understand how to use the product? Is it easy to recognize the product? Question points: not understood/understood, easy to learn/difficult to learn, complicated/easy, clear/confusing. 4) Dependencies: Do users feel in control of the interaction? Are interactions with the product safe and predictable? Items: unpredictable/predictable, obstructive/supportive, safe/unsafe, met expectations/did not meet expectations. 5) Stimulation: Is it interesting and exciting to use the product? Do users feel motivated to use the product further? Items: valuable/inferior, boring/interesting, unattractive/interesting, motivating/demotivating. 6) Novelty: Is the product design innovative and creative? Does the product catch the user's attention? Items: creative / boring, inventive / conventional, ordinary / cutting edge, conservative / innovative. Conscientiousness, Efficiency and Dependability are aspects of goal-oriented pragmatic qualities.
Results:
This research is a nominal categorical descriptive that uses a cross sectional design, namely a study by approach, observation or data collection at one time (point time approach). This research was conducted by giving questionnaires to Anesthesiology residence using the Application at USU Hospital. This research was conducted at USU Hospital and the examination was carried out in an inpatient room. This research was conducted after obtaining approval from the USU Medical Faculty Research Ethics Committee/ USU Hospital. The study population was all Anesthesiology residence who worked at USU Hospital. The sample taken in this study is the Consecutive Sampling (entire population) that has met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The number of samples in this study using the Total Sampling method, namely all Anesthesiology residence USU MEDICAL FACULTY, totaling 99 people.
Conclusions:
From the evaluation results, it can be seen that the average total scale is at number 1 with the highest value on the efficiency scale of 2,184 and the lowest value on the novelty scale with a value of 1,598. Based on the benchmark diagram of the old design of the Smartphone application as a Patient Perioperative Data Reporting System, it can be said to be in the Good-to-Excellent category because each scale has a total average value above 1, so that further evaluation will be carried out using Cooperative Evaluation techniques to know what problems are faced according to the user's perception.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.