Previously submitted to: JMIR Infodemiology (no longer under consideration since Mar 09, 2023)
Date Submitted: Feb 2, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 2, 2022 - Mar 30, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
On Public Sentiments Towards COVID–19 Vaccines in South African Cities: An Analysis of Twitter Posts.
ABSTRACT
Background:
While vaccination against the coronavirus (COVID–19) lasts, Twitter has become one of the social media platforms used to generate discussions about the COVID–19 vaccination. These types of discussions most times lead to a compromise of public confidence towards the vaccine. The text-based data generated by these discussions are used by researchers to extract topics and perform sentiment analysis on provincial, country, or continent level without considering the local communities.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to use geoclustering of Twitter posts to inform city-level variations in sentiments toward COVID–19 vaccine-related topics in the three largest South African cities (Cape Town, Durban, and Johannesburg).
Methods:
We generated a dataset and processed (n=25,000) COVID–19 vaccine-related tweets in South Africa from January 2021 to August 2021 using the academic researcher Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) with keywords like vaccine, vaccination, AstraZeneca, Oxford-AstraZeneca, VaccineToSaveSouthAfrica, JohnsonJohnson, and pfizer. Tweets were mapped with their geolocation. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to identify frequently discussed topics across the cities. Senti- ments (negative, neutral, and positive) scores were assigned using the Valence Aware Dictionary with Support Vector Machine classification algorithm.
Results:
The number of new COVID–19 cases significantly positively correlated with the number of Tweets in South Africa (Corr=0.462, P<.001). Out of the 10 topics identified from the tweets, 2 were about the COVID–19 vaccines: uptake and supply, respectively. The intensity of the sentiments score for the two topics was associated with the total number of vaccines administered in South Africa (P<.001). Discussions regarding the two topics showed higher intensity scores for neutral sentiment class (P=.015) than for other sentiment classes. Additionally, the intensity of the discussions for the two topics was associated with the total number of vaccines administered, new cases, deaths, and recoveries across the three cities (P<.001). The sentiment score for the most discussed topic, vaccine uptake, differed across the three cities, with (P=.003), (P=.002), and (P<.001) for positive, negative, and neutral sentiments classes, respectively.
Conclusions:
The outcome of this research showed that geolocation clustering of Twitter posts can be used to better analyze the sentiments towards COVID–19 vaccines at the local level. This can provide additional city–level information to health policy and decision-making regarding COVID–19 vaccine hesitancy.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.