Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 24, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 22, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Sample Bias in Web-Based Patient-Generated Health Data of Dutch Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Survey Study

Dirkson A, den Hollander D, Verberne S, Desar I, Husson O, van der Graaf WT, Oosten A, Reyners A, Steeghs N, van Loon W, van Oortmerssen G, Gelderblom H, Kraaij W

Sample Bias in Web-Based Patient-Generated Health Data of Dutch Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(12):e36755

DOI: 10.2196/36755

PMID: 36520526

PMCID: 9801270

Sample bias in online patient generated health data of Dutch Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor patients: Survey study

  • Anne Dirkson; 
  • Dide den Hollander; 
  • Suzan Verberne; 
  • Ingrid Desar; 
  • Olga Husson; 
  • Winette T.A. van der Graaf; 
  • Astrid Oosten; 
  • An Reyners; 
  • Neeltje Steeghs; 
  • Wouter van Loon; 
  • Gerard van Oortmerssen; 
  • Hans Gelderblom; 
  • Wessel Kraaij

ABSTRACT

Background:

Increasingly, social media is being recognized as a potential resource for patient-reported outcomes in particular for pharmacovigilance. Although representativeness of the online patient population is an often noted as a concern, studies in this field are limited.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to investigate the sample bias of patient-centered social media in Dutch Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) patients.

Methods:

A population-based survey was conducted in the Netherlands among 328 GIST patients diagnosed 2-13 years ago to investigate their digital communication use with fellow patients. A logistic regression analysis was used to analyze clinical and demographic differences between forum users and non-users.

Results:

Eighteen percent of survey respondents reported having contact with fellow patients via social media. The majority made use of GIST patient forums. Forum users are more likely to be monitored on adjuvant or palliative treatment and less likely to be considered cured than non-users (P=.001). Forum users also report a lower level of social functioning (84.8 of 100) than non-users (93.8 of 100) (P=.008). We found no statistically significant differences for age, sex, socioeconomic status and time since diagnosis.

Conclusions:

Over- and underrepresentation of GIST patients in different treatment phases on social media should be taken into account when sourcing patient forums for patient-reported outcomes. A further investigation of the sample bias in other online patient populations is warranted as well as research into methods for bias mitigation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dirkson A, den Hollander D, Verberne S, Desar I, Husson O, van der Graaf WT, Oosten A, Reyners A, Steeghs N, van Loon W, van Oortmerssen G, Gelderblom H, Kraaij W

Sample Bias in Web-Based Patient-Generated Health Data of Dutch Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Survey Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(12):e36755

DOI: 10.2196/36755

PMID: 36520526

PMCID: 9801270

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.