Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: iProceedings

Date Submitted: Jan 19, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of the Dengue Surveillance System in Islamabad (2019)

Saeed S, Chaudhry A, Mahmood A, Khalid F, Malik MW, Ranjha MA, Baig ZI, Ashraf N, Khan MA, Ansari JA, Ikram A

Evaluation of the Dengue Surveillance System in Islamabad (2019)

iProc 2022;8(1):e36630

DOI: 10.2196/36630

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluation of Dengue Surveillance System in Islamabad – 2019

  • Sara Saeed; 
  • Ambreen Chaudhry; 
  • Amjad Mahmood; 
  • Fawad Khalid; 
  • Muhammad Wasif Malik; 
  • Muazzam Abbas Ranjha; 
  • Zeeshan Iqbal Baig; 
  • Nosheen Ashraf; 
  • Mumtaz Ali Khan; 
  • Jamil A Ansari; 
  • Aamer Ikram

ABSTRACT

Background:

Dengue is a major public health threat since 2005 in Pakistan. Because of their rapid expansion and long duration, dengue epidemics reduce the productive capacity and economic development of many sections of society. Evaluation is very important step of planning cycle to improve the utilization of resources.

Objective:

The overall objective of the study was to assess how quickly the system can detect epidemics and to measure the capacity of the system to monitor trends of its geographical distribution over time.

Methods:

A cross sectional study was conducted from July to September 2019 at Islamabad. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of system attributes was carried out according to Updated CDC Guidelines for evaluating public health Surveillance Systems, 2001.Stake holders were identified and approached. 4 different types of semi structured questionnaires were prepared for each level of stake holders.

Results:

Simplicity was very good, case definition was uniform and easily understandable. Flexibility is poor, the system is not capable of incorporating changes. Timeliness is excellent in terms of case reporting as well as case response by relevant stake holders. Data entry operators were less in number but expert in their work, however quality of data remained a challenge as 40 % forms were deficient in demographic and clinical information. Acceptability by the workers as well as population is very good. Sensitivity is high 87%. PVP is excellent 76%. Stability is good in terms of finances and logistics. Whereas representativeness is insufficient only 30%.

Conclusions:

The overall performance of the surveillance system for dengue in |Islamabad was excellent in terms of sensitivity and PVP. Timeliness is excellent and acceptability is very good. Whereas representativeness is poor. Coverage of the system needs to be extended and private set ups and laboratories to be included. Feedback being an important aspect of planning cycle needs improvement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Saeed S, Chaudhry A, Mahmood A, Khalid F, Malik MW, Ranjha MA, Baig ZI, Ashraf N, Khan MA, Ansari JA, Ikram A

Evaluation of the Dengue Surveillance System in Islamabad (2019)

iProc 2022;8(1):e36630

DOI: 10.2196/36630

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.