Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: iProceedings

Date Submitted: Jan 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Bacterial Contamination of Intensive Care Units, Sana’a City, Yemen, 2019

Al Amad M, Al Shargabi IA, Nasher S, Al-Haidari SA, Al-Dubaiee R, Moghalles SA, Al Moayad KA

Bacterial Contamination of Intensive Care Units, Sana’a City, Yemen, 2019

iProc 2022;8(1):e36591

DOI: 10.2196/36591

Bacterial Contamination of Intensive Care Units, Sana'a City, 2019, Yemen

  • Mohammed Al Amad; 
  • Intesar Abdulsalam Al Shargabi; 
  • Samar Nasher; 
  • Sami Ahmed Al-Haidari; 
  • Riham Al-Dubaiee; 
  • Suaad Ameen Moghalles; 
  • Khaled Abdullah Al Moayad

ABSTRACT

Background:

Bacterial contamination of intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the risk factors responsible for high incidence of nosocomial infection that can significantly increase the mortality among ICU patients

Objective:

This study investigate the bacterial contamination and pathogen isolates from ICU environment of Sana'a city hospitals

Methods:

A descriptive cross-sectional study in Sana'a city hospitals during 5th to 15th December 2019 was conducted. All hospitals that frequently reported mortality among ICU patients were included. Sterile swab moistened in sterile normal saline were used for collecting samples. Seven ICU sites including; patient's bed, bedside table, masks of O2 supplying apparatus, intravenous stand (IV stand), knop door, wall and floor were targeted and two samples from each site were collected. The samples were transported to National Center of Public Health Laboratory for microbiological culture.

Results:

A total of 112 swabs were collected from ICU of eight hospitals. 87 (78%) yielded positive bacterial growth and 109 bacterial strains including 62% (68) gram-positive and 38% (41) gram-negative bacteria were isolated. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus cerus were predominate gram positive which accounted for 28% (30), 21% (23) and 10% (11) of bacterial isolates, respectively. Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas species and Acinetobacter were the gram-negative isolates accounted for 13% (14), 13% (14) and 12% (13) of all bacterial isolates, respectively. The common contaminated sites were patient's beds/bedside tables (40 strains, 37%), floors (24 strains, 22%), walls (15 strains, 14%) and masks of O2 supplying apparatus (12 strains, 11%). Knop door and IV stand were contaminated by (9 strains, 8%) of isolated bacteria

Conclusions:

The contamination of ICU environment was high and patient's surroundings were the most contaminated. Implementations of strict quality standards of hygienic manners and effective cleaning of inanimate surfaces by hospital's infection control units and periodic monitoring by health authority are highly recommend.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Al Amad M, Al Shargabi IA, Nasher S, Al-Haidari SA, Al-Dubaiee R, Moghalles SA, Al Moayad KA

Bacterial Contamination of Intensive Care Units, Sana’a City, Yemen, 2019

iProc 2022;8(1):e36591

DOI: 10.2196/36591

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.