Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Dec 29, 2021
Date Accepted: May 17, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining the International Palliative Care Systems in Rural Areas: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study

Abbott-Anderson K, Mondejar-Pont M, Ramon-Aribau A, Kumpula R, Neiman T, De Ruiter HP

Examining the International Palliative Care Systems in Rural Areas: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(7):e36037

DOI: 10.2196/36037

PMID: 35776505

PMCID: 9288105

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

International Palliative Care Systems: A comparative case study protocol examining palliative care in rural areas.

  • Kristen Abbott-Anderson; 
  • Meritxell Mondejar-Pont; 
  • Anna Ramon-Aribau; 
  • Renee Kumpula; 
  • Tammy Neiman; 
  • Hans-Peter De Ruiter

ABSTRACT

Background:

The aging population in the Global North is associated with an increased prevalence of multiple chronic diseases that would benefit from Integrated Palliative Care (IPC) 1. Often, the elderly reside in rural areas that lack access to comprehensive healthcare services. Therefore, it is vital to consider the effectiveness of healthcare systems and their ability to respond to the healthcare needs of this population, including access to palliative care (PC) services. Understanding palliative care program availability, care access, and Palliative Care Systems (PCS) characteristics are important to create useful health interventions in rural areas.

Objective:

This study aims to provide an international view of chronic health issues that the elderly face. This study will compare two culturally and geographically different PCS's, one in Osona, Catalonia, Spain, and the second in Southern Minnesota, United States.

Methods:

This study will be performed using qualitative case study methodology. The initial phase consisted of a literature search to identify a framework for describing Integrated Palliative Care Systems (IPCS) 2. In the second phase, a medium-sized rural area in Southern Minnesota will be compared with a similarly sized rural area in Catalonia, Spain. Finally, critical providers in PCS and IPCS will be identified and invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. These interviews will focus on the perceived gap between ideal IPCS care services with existing PCS/IPCS services. In addition, the participants will be asked about their perceptions of ethical issues and dilemmas that evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results:

Timeline: After an ethical review of this protocol, data collection is anticipated to begin in the spring of 2022 and is expected to take six months. Data collection will be followed by data analysis in fall 2022. Finally, the researchers plan to disseminate the findings in the spring of 2023.

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

Studying two similarly sized but culturally and geographically different rural PCS's will give insights into how IPCS impacts the chronically ill and elderly. This study findings will contribute to enhanced patient care, organizational improvements, policy change, and understanding the impact of different healthcare system models. In addition, new patient-centered care strategies will be identified by understanding the ethical dilemmas encountered by PCS healthcare providers. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Abbott-Anderson K, Mondejar-Pont M, Ramon-Aribau A, Kumpula R, Neiman T, De Ruiter HP

Examining the International Palliative Care Systems in Rural Areas: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11(7):e36037

DOI: 10.2196/36037

PMID: 35776505

PMCID: 9288105

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.